Itinerarium curiosum (centuria II) : $b or, an account of the antiquities, and remarkable curiosities in nature or art, observed in travels through Great Britain. To which is added, the Itinerary of Richard of Cirencester, monk of Westminster. With an account of that author and his workStukeley, William
History
Itinerarium curiosum (centuria II) : $b or, an account of the antiquities, and remarkable curiosities in nature or art, observed in travels through Great Britain. To which is added, the Itinerary of Richard of Cirencester, monk of Westminster. With an account of that author and his work
Stukeley, William
Great Britain -- Antiquities -- Early works to 1800; Great Britain -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800
but the Greeks ought to be so grateful as to acknowledge by whom they
profited; for they learnt first from the Egyptians; nor will we deny
that they improved upon them. When Strabo mentions these roofless
temples, and walls covered with sculptures of large figures, and the
abundance of huge pillars set in many rows, who sees not the exact
conformity between this work, and that of Persepolis? and these
collections of pillars, though I suppose set in a square form, are no
other than our quincuple circle. I took notice too, that these temples
are set in such straggling order as ours here at Stanton Drue, and by
examination find that the two largest are at an angle of 20 degrees of
one another (I mean, their middle points, or centres) from the cardinal
line, or that which runs from east to west: here is likewise the same
number of five temples, and like diversity of number of stones, and
manner of forms in each, as of ours: the only difference consists
in the one being square, the other round; owing to the particular
notions of the two people, judging this, and that, most apt for sacred
structures. The work at Persepolis too is made upon an artificial
eminence, or pavement of most prodigious stones, instead of a natural
one, the ascent to which is by steps; which is enough to overthrow
any notion of a palace: but they that see not its intent, that it was
wholly a religious building, and that there is not one symptom of its
being a civil one, ought to be disregarded. All the sculptures are
religious, being processions of the priests to sacrifice; which has
nothing to do with a palace: the work of pillars never had a roof on
it, because of the flower-work at top: besides, there are no walls,
never were; and what the incurious spectators take for walls, are only
single stones set like those of our monument: and the doors are no
more than one stone laid across two more, as those of Stonehenge: the
mouldings of them go quite round; so that, had there been a wall, half
of them would have been covered. But it is lost time to speak any more
of that affair.
[Illustration: 79·2ᵈ.
_Stukeley d._
_A View at_ Stanton Drew]
I make no doubt but the name of Stanton Drue is derived from our
Monument; _Stanton_ from the stones, and _Drue_ from the Druids. It
moves not me, that some of the name of Drew might have lived here
formerly; for such a family might take the denomination of the town,
and, leaving out the first part, retain only that of Drew. It is
sufficient conviction, that there are so many other towns in England,
and elsewhere, that have preserved this name, and all remarkable for
monuments of nature. The number of the stones are 160.
INDEX TO ITER BOREALE.
A
Addingham, 47
Alcester, 21
Aldborough, 73
Ale, called Hather, 64
Anchor Hill, 37
Anker River, 20
Antique Marbles, 26
Arbury, 20
Arduen Forest, 20
Arthur’s Round Table, 43
Ashler Stone, 37
Astley, Geo. Esq;, 20
B
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account