Suffragists -- United States; Women -- Suffrage -- United States
“Here was a case concerning twenty-five or thirty ladies. The statement
as to their treatment was bloodcurdling; it was shocking to man’s ideas
of humanity if it is true. They are here in court, and yet your answer
denies all these facts which they submit, It is a question whether you
can do that anal yet deny these petitioners the right of testimony.”
Proceeding with this argument, the defense contended that the act
itself of the District Commissioners in sending prisoners to the
Occoquan workhouse was illegal; that no formal transfer from one
institution to another had ever been made, the sentencing papers
distinctly stating that all prisoners were committed to “the Washington
Asylum and Jail.”
“We deny that the records of the Commissioners of the District of
Columbia can show that there was any order made by the Board for the
removal of these women. The liberty of a citizen cannot be so
disregarded and trifled with that any police official or jailer may at
his own volition, commit and hold him in custody and compel him to
work. The liberty of the people depends upon a broader foundation.”
Repeated questions brought out from Mr. Zinkhan, Warden of the Jail,
the fact that the directions given by the Commissioners to transfer
prisoners from the jail to Occoquan rested entirely upon a verbal order
given “five or six years ago.”
“Do you really mean,” interrupted the court, “that the only authority
you have on the part of the Commissioners of the District of Columbia
to transfer parties down to Occoquan is a verbal order made five or six
years ago?”
Questions by the defense brought out the fact also that Mr. Zinkhan
could remember in detail the first oral orders he had received for such
a transfer, dating back to 1911, although he could not remember
important details as to how he had received the orders concerning the
suffragists committed to his care! He only knew that “orders were oral
and explicit.”
Q. [By defense in court You say the three commissioners were present?
A. Sure.
Q. Who else was present?
A. I am not sure just now who else was present. I remember somebody
else was there, but I don’t remember just who . . . .
Q. Were the three commissioners present at the time Mr. [Commissioner]
Brownlow gave you this order?
A. Yes.
Q. You say it was a verbal order of the Commissioners?
A. Yes.
Q. Was the clerk of the Board present?
A. I think not.
Q. And you cannot remember who was present aside from the three
Commissioners?
A. No, I cannot remember just now.
Q. Try to recollect who was present at that meeting when this order was
given, aside from the Commissioners. There was somebody else present?
A. It is my impression that there was some one other person present,
but I am not sure just now who it was.
Q. It was some official, some one well known, was it not . . . .?
A. I am not sure. . . .
[This conference was one in which Mr. McAdoo was reported to have
participated.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account