Suffragists -- United States; Women -- Suffrage -- United States
Senator Cummins explained that he finally got the promise of the
Chairman that a meeting of the Committee would be called on a given
date. When it was not called he made his motion.
Chairman Jones made some feeble remarks and some evasive excuses which
meant nothing, and which only further aroused Republican friends of the
measure on the Committee.
Senator Gronna of North Dakota, Republican, interrupted him with the
direct question, “I ask the chairman of this committee why this joint
resolution has not been reported? The Senator, who is chairman of the
committee, I suppose, knows as well as I do that the people of the
entire country are anxious to have this joint resolution submitted and
to be given an opportunity to vote upon it.
Senator Johnson of California, Republican, proposed that Chairman Jones
consent to call the Committee together to consider reporting out the
bill, which Senator Jones flatly refused to do.
Senator Jones of Washington, another Republican member of the
Committee, added:
“I agree with the Senator from Iowa that this is a war measure and
ought to be considered as such at this time. I do not see how we can
very consistently talk democracy while disfranchising the better half
of our citizenship—I may not approve of the action of the women
picketing the White House, but neither do I approve of what I consider
the lawless action toward these women in connection with the picketing
. . . .”
“I do not want to think the chairman does not desire to call the
committee together because of some influence outside of Congress as
some have suggested . . . .”
At this point Senator Hollis of New Hampshire, Democrat, arose to say:
“There is a small but very active group of women suffragists who have
acted in such a way that some who are ardently in favor of woman
suffrage believe that their action should not be encouraged by making a
favorable report at this time.”
Senator Johnson protested at this point, but Senator Hollis continued:
“To discharge the committee would focus the attention of the country
upon the action and would give undue weight to what has been done by
the active group of woman suffragists.”
I think that any student of psychology will acknowledge that our
picketing had stimulated action in Congress, and that what was now
needed was some still more provocative action from us.
Chapter 5
August Riots
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account