James Clerk Maxwell and Modern PhysicsGlazebrook, Richard
History
James Clerk Maxwell and Modern Physics
Glazebrook, Richard
Maxwell, James Clerk, 1831-1879; Physics -- History
(4) The view that electro-magnetic forces arise entirely from strains
and stresses set up in the ether; the electrostatic charge of an
insulated conductor being one of the forms in which the ether strain is
manifested to us.
(5) A dielectric under the action of electric force is said to
become polarised, and, according to Maxwell (vol. i. p. 133), all
electrification is the residual effect of the polarisation of the
dielectric.
Now it must, I think, be admitted that in Maxwell’s day there was
direct proof of very few of these propositions. No one has even yet so
measured the displacement currents in a dielectric as to show that the
total flow across every section of a circuit is at any given moment
the same, though there are other experiments of an indirect character
which have now completely justified Maxwell’s hypothesis. Experiments
by Schiller and Von Helmholtz prove it is true that some action in
the dielectric must be taken into consideration in any satisfactory
theory; they therefore upset various theories based on direct action at
a distance, “but they tell us nothing as to whether any special form
of the dielectric theory, such as Maxwell’s or Helmholtz’s, is true or
not.” (J. J. Thomson, “Report on Electrical Theories,” B.A. Report,
1885, p. 149.)
When Maxwell died there had been little if any experimental evidence
as to the stresses set up in a body by electric force. Fontana, Govi,
and Duter had all observed that changes take place in the volume of
the dielectric of a condenser when it is charged. Quincke had taken
up the work, and the first of his classic papers on this subject was
published in 1880, the year following Maxwell’s death. Maxwell himself
was fond of shewing an experiment in which a charged insulated sphere
was brought near to the surface of paraffin; the stress on the surface
causes a heaping up of the paraffin under the sphere.
Kerr had shewn in 1875 that many substances become doubly refracting
under electric stress; his complete determination of the laws of this
action was published at a later date.
As to direct measurements on electric waves, there were none; the value
of the velocity with which, if Maxwell’s theory were true, they must
travel had been determined from electrical observations of quite a
different character. Weber and Kohlrausch had measured the value of K
for air, for which μ is unity, and from their observations it follows
that the value of the wave velocity for electro-magnetic waves is about
31 × 10⁹ centimetres per second. The velocity of light was known, from
the experiments of Fizeau and Foucault, to have about this value, and
it was the near coincidence of these two values which led Maxwell to
write in 1864:--
“The agreement of the results seems to show that light and magnetism
are affections of the same substance, and that light is an
electro-magnetic disturbance propagated through the field according to
electro-magnetic laws.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account