James Clerk Maxwell and Modern PhysicsGlazebrook, Richard
History
James Clerk Maxwell and Modern Physics
Glazebrook, Richard
Maxwell, James Clerk, 1831-1879; Physics -- History
Since Maxwell’s death volumes have been written on electrical
questions, which have all been inspired by his work. The standpoint
from which electrical theory is regarded has been entirely changed. The
greatest masters of mathematical physics have found, in the development
of Maxwell’s views, a task that called for all their powers, and the
harvest of new truths which has been garnered has proved most rich. But
while this is so, the question is still often asked, What is Maxwell’s
theory? Hertz himself concludes the introduction just referred to with
his most interesting answer to this question. Prof. Boltzmann has made
the theory the subject of an important course of lectures. Poincaré,
in the introduction to his “Lectures on Maxwell’s Theories and the
Electro-magnetic Theory of Light,” expresses the difficulty, which many
feel, in understanding what the theory is. “The first time,” he says,
“that a French reader opens Maxwell’s book a feeling of uneasiness,
often even of distrust, is mingled with his admiration. It is only
after prolonged study, and at the cost of many efforts, that this
feeling is dissipated. Some great minds retain it always.” And again
he writes: “A French _savant_, one of those who have most completely
fathomed Maxwell’s meaning, said to me once, ‘I understand everything
in the book except what is meant by a body charged with electricity.’”
In considering this question, Poincaré’s own remark--“Maxwell does
not give a mechanical explanation of electricity and magnetism, he is
only concerned to show that such an explanation is possible”--is most
important.
We cannot find in the “Electricity” an answer to the question--What is
an electric charge? Maxwell did not pretend to know, and the attempt to
give too great definiteness to his views on this point is apt to lead
to a misconception of what those views were.
On the old theories of action at a distance and of electric and
magnetic fluids attracting according to known laws, it was easy to be
mechanical. It was only necessary to investigate the manner in which
such fluids could distribute themselves so as to be in equilibrium,
and to calculate the forces arising from the distribution. The problem
of assigning such a mechanical structure to the ether as will permit
of its exerting the action which occurs in an electro-magnetic field
is a harder one to solve, and till it is solved the question--What is
an electric charge?--must remain unanswered. Still, in order to grasp
Maxwell’s theory this knowledge is not necessary.
The properties of ether in dielectrics and in conductors must be quite
different. In a dielectric the ether has the power of storing energy by
some change in its configuration or its structure; in a conductor this
power is absent, owing probably to the action of the matter of which
the conductor is composed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account