James Clerk Maxwell and Modern PhysicsGlazebrook, Richard
History
James Clerk Maxwell and Modern Physics
Glazebrook, Richard
Maxwell, James Clerk, 1831-1879; Physics -- History
“For some years previous to 1866, when Maxwell returned to
Cambridge as Moderator in the Mathematical Tripos, the studies
in the University had lost touch with the great scientific
movements going on outside her walls. It was said that some
of the subjects most in vogue had but little interest for the
present generation, and loud complaints began to be heard
that while such branches of knowledge as Heat, Electricity,
and Magnetism were left out of the Tripos examination, the
candidates were wasting their time and energy upon mathematical
trifles barren of scientific interest and of practical results.
Into the movement for reform Maxwell entered warmly. By his
questions in 1866, and subsequent years, he infused new life
into the examination; he took an active part in drafting the
new scheme introduced in 1873; but most of all by his writings
he exerted a powerful influence on the younger members of the
University, and was largely instrumental in bringing about the
change which has been now effected.”
But the University possessed no means of teaching these subjects, and a
Syndicate or Committee was appointed, November 25th, 1868, “to consider
the best means of giving instruction to students in Physics, especially
in Heat, Electricity and Magnetism, and the methods of providing
apparatus for this purpose.”
Dr. Cookson, Master of St. Peter’s College, took an active part in the
work of the Syndicate. Professor Stokes, Professor Liveing, Professor
Humphry, Dr. Phear, and Dr. Routh were among the members. Maxwell
himself was in Cambridge that winter, as Examiner for the Tripos, and
his work as Moderator and Examiner in the two previous years had done
much to show the necessity of alterations and to indicate the direction
which changes should take.
The Syndicate reported February 27th, 1869. They called attention to
the Report of the Royal Commission of 1850. The Commissioners had
“prominently urged the importance of cultivating a knowledge of the
great branches of Experimental Physics in the University”; and in
page 118 of their Report, after commending the manner in which the
subject of Physical Optics is studied in the University, and pointing
out that “there is, perhaps, no public institution where it is better
represented or prosecuted with more zeal and success in the way of
original research,” they had stated that “no reason can be assigned
why other great branches of Natural Science should not become equally
objects of attention, or why Cambridge should not become a great school
of physical and experimental, as it is already of mathematical and
classical, instruction.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account