Watt's invention and all it has led to is only a step on the way
to harnessing the forces of nature to the service of man. Do you
doubt that other inventions will work changes even more sweeping
than those which the steam engine has brought?
Consider a moment. The problem of which Watt solved a part is
not the problem of inventing a machine, but the problem of using
and storing the forces of nature which now go to waste. Now to
us who live on the earth there is only one source of power--the
sun. Darken the sun and every engine on the earth's surface
would soon stop, every wheel cease to turn, and all movement
cease. How prodigal this supply of power is we seldom stop to
consider. Deducting the atmospheric absorption, it is still true
that the sun delivers on each square yard of the earth's
surface, when he is shining, the equivalent of one horse-power
working continuously. Enough mechanical power goes to waste on
the college campus to warm and light and supply all the
manufactories, street railroads and other consumers of
mechanical power in the city. How to harness this power and to
store it--that is the problem of the inventor and the engineer
of the twentieth century, a problem which in good time is sure
to be solved.
Who shall doubt, after finding this secret source of force in water,
that some future Watt is to discover other sources of power, or
perchance succeed in utilising the superabundant power known to exist in
the heat of the sun, or discover the secret of the latent force employed
by nature in animals, which converts chemical energy directly into the
dynamic form, giving much higher efficiencies than any thermo-dynamic
machine has to-day or probably ever can have. Little knew Shakespeare of
man's perfect power of motion which utilises all energy! How came he
then to exclaim "What a piece of work is man; how infinite in faculty;
in form and _moving_ how express and admirable"? This query, and a
thousand others, have arisen; for we forget Arnold's lines to the
Master:
"Others abide our question. Thou art free.
We ask and ask--thou smilest and art still."
Man's "moving" is found more "express and admirable" than that of the
most perfect machine or adaptation of natural forces yet devised. Lord
Kelvin says the animal motor more closely resembles an electro-magnetic
engine than a heat engine, but very probably the chemical forces in
animals produce the external mechanical effects through electricity and
do not act as a thermo-dynamic engine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account