Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
Viscount Cranbrook said in his reply to a question asked by Viscount
Sidmouth: “That the papers to which he referred did contain a written
statement, and a very long written statement on the part of the Chinese
Government giving the guarantee in question. It was not a mere verbal
statement by the Chinese Government, but a very deliberate note. It was
found that the Chinese had received from the Russian Government a
guarantee that Russia would not interfere with Corean territory in
future if the British did not, and the Chinese Government were naturally
in a position, on the faith of that guarantee by the Russian Government,
to give a guarantee to the British Government. The Marquess of
Salisbury, on the part of her Majesty’s Government, had accepted it as a
guarantee in writing from the Chinese Government.”
This policy was undoubtedly an exceedingly wise and good one. By this
England not only regained a firm and complete commercial alliance, but
also maintained and strengthened a political alliance against Russian
attacks from the Corea and indirectly from Manchooria and Mongolia.
England also saved money by the abandonment of the Port Hamilton scheme,
and saved her fleet from being, to a certain degree, scattered in such a
far-off quarter of the globe.
England now holds complete sway both commercially and navally in the
Pacific. Lord Salisbury’s policy is worthy of all praise, together with
Mr. Gladstone’s original scheme. If the scheme had never been originated
there would not have been so firm an Anglo-Chinese alliance as there now
is.
England’s power at the present time is three times as great as that of
Russia in the Pacific; in fact Russia has always been overweighted in
that respect. Therefore it is selfevident she could never be able to
withstand the combined Anglo-Chinese fleets.
It seems to me that the only feasible plan for a Russian attack on
Anglo-Chinese alliance would be from Mongolia and Manchooria by means of
an alliance with the Mongolian Tartars. This would be preferable to
coping with England face to face in the Pacific.
Chinese history plainly tells us that the Chinese could not withstand an
attack of the brave Mongol Tartars from the north, and that they have
proved a constant source of dread to them.
The Great Wall which stretches across the whole northern limit of the
Chinese Empire from the sea to the farthest western corner of the
Province of Kansal, was built only for the defence of China against the
northern “daring” Tartars.
Ghenghis Khan (1194), the rival of Attila, in the extent of his kingdom,
who overran the greater part of China and subdued nearly the whole of N.
Asia, who carried his arms into Persia and Delhi, drove the Indians on
to the Ganges, and also destroyed Astrakhan and the power of the
Ottoman, was a Mongolian Tartar.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account