Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
Many combined circumstances led Russia to assume an aggressive policy
towards Turkey specially. Sweden, or rather Finland, was not of
sufficient importance as a prey to the “northern bear”—a warmer climate
was also wanted. Catherine had already discovered the mistaken policy of
Peter the Great, who had spent all his energy in getting the strongholds
of the Baltic in opposition to Charles XII. of Sweden. Russian sway on
the Baltic meant a direct opposition from two great sea Powers, viz.,
England and Holland, whose interests would suffer thereby. A striking
proof of the opposition was seen in the case of the Northern War.
The Partition of Poland produced another stray Power in the Baltic, to
wit, Prussia.
Previous to the Partition of Poland, Prussia Proper and her dominions,
Brandenberg and Silesia, were separated, Poland being between them. The
First Partition joined the Prussian kingdom to the main body of the
Monarchy; by the Second and Third Partitions Prussia obtained the then
South Prussia and East Prussia, thereby uniting all into one compact
body.
Thus unconsciously a powerful Russian enemy was being formed in the
Baltic. Thus Russia had three great enemies—England, Holland, and
Prussia, joined by Sweden and Denmark, on the Baltic.
Catherine had already obtained a firm footing on the Black Sea coast,
and was confident of her ability to occupy Constantinople and make it a
Russian southern capital; the French Revolution attracting the attention
of Western Europe, the Ottoman Empire was left at the mercy of Russia.
Again a Russian occupation would give a fine prospect of extending
Russian authority into Danubian territory, Central Asia, and Asia Minor.
So we may conclude that Catherine’s annexation of Poland was only a step
towards attaining her great aim, and gave her time to mature her plans.
At this juncture Catherine died, and was succeeded by Paul (1796). He
reversed his mother’s policy by concluding an alliance with Turkey
against Napoleon, seeing that the latter’s policy was to destroy the
Turkish Empire for the benefit of France. He changed his policy later,
however, after his unsuccessful campaign in Holland, and threw himself
into Napoleon’s arms by establishing an armed neutrality in the north
against England.
_Alexander I._ (1801–1825).
Catherine died (1796), but her plan did not perish with her. Alexander
I. proved a faithful expounder of the late Czarina’s schemes.
His strong-handed policy was chiefly directed against Armenia and the
Persian frontier, although the Danubian territory, Poland and Finland,
did not escape his watchful eyes. Mingrelia and Imeretia were conquered
in 1803, Shiroan in 1805–1806.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account