Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
_The Holy Alliance—The Greek insurrection—Interference of the Three
Powers—Battle of Navarino—Treaty of Adrianople—The policy of
Nicholas I.; Treaty of Unkiar Ikelessi—Turkey only saved by English
and French aid—Palmerston succeeds to Canning’s policy._
Alexander I., Emperor of Russia; Francis, Emperor of Austria; and
William I., King of Prussia, formed what was known as the Holy Alliance,
the first-named being the chief instigator.
Its aim was to promote peace and goodwill among European nations, based
upon Christianity, although it seemed quite liable to be abused for the
benefit of absolute monarchy, as in the case of Spain. Nearly all the
European Powers joined it, England[49] being the only one who declined.
England’s argument was that “such interference is inconsistent with the
fundamental laws of Great Britain. It must lead to a system of continual
interference incompatible with European interests and the independence
of nations.”[50] However, we are forced to admit and acknowledge that
the present system of Europe is conducted on the same lines, slightly
modified, as the Holy Alliance.
At the end of the eighteenth century the songs of the poet Rhegus and
the revolutionary influence of France (1789) stirred up the Greeks to
feelings of hatred against the Porte.
In 1821 the Danubian Provinces (Roumania), under the leadership of
Hypisilands, rose in rebellion, trusting to receiving assistance from
Alexander I., the instigator of the Holy Alliance. But their hopes were
shattered, and Turkey soon crushed the revolt. This was the only case in
which Russia did not interfere with Turkey in the Danubian question.
A little reflection, however, will show the cause of the Russian
non-interference in this case. Alexander’s power and influence were
declining, and Russia was filled internally with discontent. Secret
societies flourished everywhere, and the Czar dreaded a revolution in
his own country if he gave help to the Danubian Provinces, which would
be approving a rebellion against a legitimate sovereign.
The Greek rising in the Morea was answered by a counter Turkish massacre
of Greeks in most of the principal cities of Turkey, and Gregory, the
head of the Greek Church at Constantinople, was executed. This caused
great indignation in the Russias and war appeared imminent, but owing to
the mediation of England and Austria it was averted.
There is no doubt that Russia felt that it was to her advantage to
assist a revolutionary movement, in order that she might secure as much
influence in Turkey as possible. But Austrian interest in the Balkans
was of vital importance. Her policy was naturally to oppose Russia in
her desires, in order to keep the Turkish honour unstained and use her
as a bulwark against Russia.
However, great enthusiasm was aroused, not only in England, but also in
Germany and Switzerland.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account