Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question — John Shaqi
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
Reviewing the general policy of Nicholas the reader cannot help being
struck with the skilful manner and clever system by which the Czar
carried out his plans.
Before his reign the Russian attacks were all made particularly in the
south-west and south-east direction, viz., the Danubian territory, and
Armenia; but on his accession he began to attack from a more southerly
direction even than Turkey, viz., Greece, whom he assisted in rebellion
against her Turkish oppressors. From 1826–1828 he attacked in a
south-easterly quarter, viz., Armenia and Persia, at the same time
occupying Adrianople and threatening Constantinople. Finally, to
complete his plans, he struck a fatal blow at the heart of Turkey, viz.,
its capital, Constantinople, in 1833, with the Treaty of Unkiar
Skelessi, by which Turkey was practically made a vassal of Russia.
This treaty exercised a great influence upon foreign powers. For Russia
by it would have obtained actual possession not only of the Black Sea
but also of its only entrance, the Dardanelles, which thus would have
become a fortified Russian outpost.
Turkey now was in a very precarious state. She was almost past the aid
of any earthly powers. But luckily two doctors stepped into the breach,
namely, England and France, and, after a course of treatment, the
following protocol was indited by the Pentarchy of Powers: “That ships
of war have at all times been prohibited from entering the Channel of
Constantinople, viz., by the Straits of the Dardanelles and of the Black
Sea.”
Reshid Pacha had performed for Turkey great internal reforms, but,
unfortunately, he was exiled through a Court intrigue. This proved a
great blow to Turkish politics.
Thus Turkey began to decline again; and, as John Bright said in an able
speech at Manchester (1854), “Turkey is a decaying nation;” and Cobden
on the same occasion said, “Turkey is a decaying country, and the Turks
cannot be permanently maintained as a ruling Power in Europe.” The Czar
himself said that “a sick man is dying,” referring to Turkey, in his
remarkable conversation with Sir Hamilton Seymour on January 28, 1853.
When Turkey appeared at her last gasp she had been saved by England and
France. Now, for the second time, the same Powers rescued her from
annihilation.
England a short time previously had been in a feeble state owing to her
severe war with Napoleon the Great. This had exhausted her financially
to a great extent.[54]
However, Huskisson’s commercial policy (1823), Wellingtons Catholic
Emancipation (1829), Russell’s great Reform Bill (1832), and the Repeal
of the Corn Laws by Sir Robert Peel (1846), had exercised a refreshing
influence upon her general prosperity.
Here Lord Palmerston, a disciple[55] of Canning, appeared on the scene
to play his part in “the European concert.”
V.
THE CRIMEAN WAR.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account