Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
“Now it seems to me that, unless Turkey shall be laid prostrate at the
feet of Russia by the disasters of the war—an event which England and
France could not without dishonour permit—no peace can be concluded
between the contending parties unless the Emperor consents to evacuate
the Principalities, to abandon his demands, and to renounce some of the
embarrassing stipulations of former treaties upon which he has founded
the pretensions which have been the cause of existing difficulties.
“To bring the Emperor to agree to this, it is necessary to exert a
considerable pressure upon him; and the quarter in which that pressure
can at present be most easily brought to bear is the Black Sea and the
countries bordering upon it. In the Black Sea, the combined English,
French, and Turkish squadrons are indisputably superior to the Russian
fleet, and are able to give the law to that fleet. What I would strongly
recommend, therefore, is that which I proposed some months ago to the
Cabinet, namely, that the Russian Government and the Russian admiral at
Sebastopol should be informed that so long as Russian troops occupy the
Principalities, or hold a position in any other part of the Turkish
territory, no Russian ships of war can be allowed to show themselves out
of port in the Black Sea.
“You will say that this would be an active hostility towards Russia; but
so is the declaration already made, that no Russian ships shall be
permitted to make any landing or attack on any part of the Turkish
territory. The only difference between the two declarations is that the
one already made is incomplete and insufficient for its purpose, and
that the one which I propose would be complete and sufficient. If the
Russian fleet were shut up in Sebastopol, it is probable that the Turks
would be able to make in Asia an impression that would tend to
facilitate the conclusion of peace.
“With regard to the conditions of peace, it seems to me that the only
arrangement which could afford to Europe a fair security against future
dangers arising out of the encroachments of Russia on Turkey, and the
attempts of the Russian Government to interfere in the internal affairs
of the Turkish Empire, would be that arrangement which I have often
suggested, namely, that the treaty to be concluded between Russia and
Turkey should be an ordinary treaty of peace and friendship, of
boundaries, commerce, and mutual protection of the subjects of the one
party within the territories of the other; and that all the stipulations
which might be required for the privileges of the Principalities and of
Servia, and for the protection of the Christian religion and its
churches and the Ottoman dominions by the Sultan and the five Powers. By
such a treaty, Russia would be prevented from dealing single-handed with
Turkey in regard to those matters on which she has, from time to time,
endeavoured to fasten a quarrel on the Sultan.”
Lord Aberdeen’s reply was:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account