Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
Let us turn our attention for a short time to France, which at this
period was undergoing considerable internal agitation. Republicanism was
now abolished and Monarchy reigned in its stead in the hands of Napoleon
III. (1852). There seemed every prospect of the French Monarchy being
firmly re-established.
The French Emperor was very desirous of starting a European War for the
purpose of securing his seat on the throne, and also for the
aggrandizement of his country abroad.[72] The interests of his country,
both religious and political, were opposed to those of Russia with
regard to the Holy Places, while both England and France had a common
interest in keeping the Ottoman Empire from Russia. This latter interest
acted as a means of union between the two Powers, both of whom were
ready at any moment to attack Russia, and the publication of the Czar’s
memorable conversation with Sir H. Seymour still further cemented that
union.
The result we have already seen. Russia was humiliated.
VI.
THE BLACK SEA CONFERENCE.
_French influence destroyed by the Franco-Prussian War—Russia annuls
the Black Sea clauses of the Treaty of Paris—Condition of Europe
prevents their enforcement by the Powers—London Conference; Russia
secures the Black Sea; England’s mistake—Alsace and Lorraine destroy
the balance of power._
Russia had convinced herself that the separation of England from France
was not a sufficient guarantee to hinder the possibility of the alliance
of the two Powers against her, because a common interest would unite
them immediately. Russia now determined to crush down one of the two
Powers, independently of the other, and was only waiting for an
opportunity to do so.
In 1870 the Franco-Prussian War broke out through the question of the
Spanish Succession. England maintained a strict neutrality, and this now
seemed a glorious opportunity for Russia to carry out her long-cherished
designs. She supported Prussia _morally_, in this way hoping to crush
France, and then only England would be left to attack. The result proved
favourable; France was defeated by Prussia, and this was followed by the
fall of the Monarchy, and the proclamation of the Republic (September
14, 1870).
Russia now looked around, and at a glance saw the favourable position
she occupied, and her strength. Austria had been weakened by the war
with Prussia in 1866, Spain and Italy were convulsed with revolutions,
Turkey was naturally weak; Prussia had suffered somewhat in 1866 with
Austria, and with France in 1870. France herself had undoubtedly
received a crushing blow, while England was worried over the Alabama
claims with America.
Thus we see the balance of power was considerably shaken by the
Franco-Prussian War, while an alliance among the Western states seemed
impossible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account