Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
In 1870 Western Europe was startled by Prince Gortchakoff’s declaration
that the Black Sea clauses of the Treaty of Paris, 1856, were null and
void. “He declared it would no longer be submitted to by his Imperial
master.”[73]
England naturally felt very indignant, but was practically helpless, as
she was unable to get any ally from among the Western Powers, and she
felt unable to cope singly with Russia. The Government were perplexed,
and the Premier, Mr. W. E. Gladstone, sent Lord Odo Russell to the
German Chancellor to ask his advice on the subject, and to inform him
that “the question was of such a nature that England, with or without
allies, would have to go to war with Russia.”
Prince Bismarck, who was afraid of a Franco-Russian alliance, and wished
to conciliate the Russian Emperor, recommended that a conference should
be held in St. Petersburg. The English Government objected to this, so a
Conference was held in London where the following provisions were agreed
to:—
“Article I. Articles XI., XIII., and XIV., of the Treaty of Paris, 1856,
are abrogated.
“Article II. The principle of the closing of the Straits of the
Dardanelles and the Bosphorus is maintained, with power to his Imperial
Majesty the Sultan to open the said Straits in time of peace to the
vessels of war of friendly and allied Powers, in case the Sublime Porte
should judge it necessary in order to secure the execution of the
stipulations of the Treaty of Paris.
“Article III. The Black Sea remains, as heretofore, open to the
mercantile marine of all nations.
“Article IV. The Commission managing the navigation of the Danube “is
maintained in its present composition” for a further period of twelve
years.
“Article VIII. The high contracting parties renew and confirm all the
stipulations of 1856, which are not annulled or modified by the present
treaty.”
This treaty resulted in what Russia wished, viz., the opening of the
Black Sea to Russian war ships—a right which she had held previous to
the Crimean War.
Mr. Disraeli (afterwards Lord Beaconsfield) vigorously attacked the
Gladstonian policy by saying that “the neutral character of the Black
Sea is the essence of the Treaty of Paris, and that that, in fact, was
the question for which we had struggled and made great sacrifice and
endured these sufferings which never can be forgotten,” and the “point
upon which the negotiations for peace (at Vienna, 1855) was broken off
was the neutral character of the Black Sea.”[74]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account