Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
In answer to this attack Mr. Gladstone replied, “I do not speak from
direct communication with Lord Clarendon, but I have been told since his
death that he never attached a value to that neutralization. Again I do
not speak from direct communication, but I have been told that Lord
Palmerston always looked upon the neutralization as an arrangement which
might be maintained and held together for a limited number of years, but
which, from its character, it was impossible to maintain as a permanent
condition for a great settlement of Europe.”
However, Russia had regained what she had lost at the close of the
Crimean War by skilful diplomacy. She now was perfectly at liberty to
keep her fleet in the Black Sea, and to refortify Sebastopol and Keotch
to such an extent as to render them impregnable.
She felt gratified at the result of the Franco-Prussian War, and on
hearing that Prussia had annexed Alsace and Lorraine. General Ignatieff,
the Russian Ambassador at Constantinople, hastened to the German
Ambassador, Count Karserling, and said, “Permit me to congratulate you,
and _thank you_; for you it is a prodigious mistake, but on Russia you
have conferred the greatest possible boon.” At the time of the
annexation of the two French provinces, Germany thought that they would
prove of the greatest value to the German Empire, but this idea proved a
mistake, and since then Russia has used, and still uses them, as a pivot
on which the Eastern Question turns.
Frederick III.’s idea of selling back Alsace and Lorraine would no doubt
prove a great benefit, not only to the German nation, but also to the
maintenance of the balance of power in Europe.
Yet, though Bismarck defeated Napoleon III. in a sanguinary war, Prince
Gortschakoff had beaten all the signitary powers at the Treaty of Paris
by one stroke of the pen, and the greatest gainer, in the
Franco-Prussian War was not Germany but Russia. Verily, indeed, is it
once more proved that the Pen is mightier than the Sword.
VII.
THE RUSSO-TURKISH WAR OF 1878.
_Bulgarian atrocities—The Andrassy Note; England destroys its
effect—The Berlin Memorandum; England opposes it—Russia prepares for
a Turkish war—Conference of Constantinople—New Turkish
Constitution—Russo-Turkish War—Treaty of San Stefano—Intervention of
the Powers—The Berlin Congress—Final treaty of peace._
The Slavs migrated to the Balkan Peninsula as early as 450 A.D., and
Bosnia remained the only Slavonic part of the Turkish Empire where a
native nobility owned the land and a peasantry tilled it for them.
Having been defeated by the Turks, the nobility became Mahommedans to
save their patrimony, while the peasantry, having nothing to lose,
remained Christians; but the tyranny of their nobility at length obliged
the Turks to put an end to the Feudal System in Bosnia (1850–1851).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account