Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
In August, 1875, Herzegovina (the southwestern district of Bosnia)
revolted against the Sultan, being aided by a strong natural position
and receiving the assistance of both Servia and Montenegro.
While this revolt was going on the Bulgarians also rose in rebellion
against the Sultan (1876), but were put down by the Turkish Government,
although not without shameful cruelties and outrages being committed by
the Turkish troops and militia, which caused great indignation
throughout Europe,[75] and specially so in Russia. This, therefore, gave
the latter country a good opportunity of claiming to be a general
protector of the Christians in Turkey.
The Austro-Hungarian Minister, Count Andrassy, on behalf of Austria,
Germany, and Russia, drew up a Note in which five[76] chief concessions
were insisted upon from the Porte as necessary for the pacification of
the revolted provinces.
Lord Derby, on behalf of the English Government, signed[77] it, but
added that the integrity[78] of the Ottoman Empire was to be respected.
Here the Czar caught a key-note of the English policy, and he played on
it afterwards to his own advantage.
The Porte accepted the conditions of the Note, but the rebels did not
trust the Turkish promises, so the insurrections continued.
The Czar then, with Gortschakoff, met Bismarck and Andrassy at Berlin,
and, together, they drew up the “Berlin Memorandum,”[79] in which the
three Powers asked the Sultan to grant an armistice for two months in
order that the demands of the insurgents might receive a fair
consideration. Italy and France added their voices, but England
refused[80] to sign the Memorandum and sent a powerful squadron to
Besika Bay, expecting that the Sultan would refuse the Memorandum
because it would endanger the integrity of the Ottoman Empire. This
“Berlin Memorandum” displays the skilful way in which Russia, under the
clever guidance of the Czar and his Minister Gortschakoff, carried on
negotiation. She was only seeking a _pretence_[81] for a single-handed
war policy with Turkey, and in order to do this she proposed measures at
Berlin which she knew would prove objectionable to England. Germany, who
dreaded a special alliance between France and Russia, was obliged to
agree to these measures, thus becoming a tool of Russia, who wanted to
make England first deviate from the Treaties of Paris and London, and,
if possible, to break down the balance of power in Europe which she
herself had already done by her withdrawal from the Black Sea clauses in
the Treaty of Paris. England fell into the snare together with the other
Powers. She objected to the Berlin Memorandum, refused to sign, and sent
a fleet to Besika Bay in support of her objection. This was just what
Russia desired.
A new Sultan now ascended the throne, and Russian influence declined
while that of England increased.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account