Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
The consequence would be that Austria could not possibly remain peaceful
when inhabited by bitter anti-Russian Magyars. She would have to make
war preparations and spend money, and would thus increase her financial
difficulties, and the result would be the breaking down of the Dual
Monarchy, “the personal union of fifty-six states,” a mixture of races,
religions, and tongues.
A strong and compact confederation can only be obtained by sound
financial dealings. Austria once broken down by internal discord, then
Constantinople and the Balkans would be Russian possessions.
If Russia is desirous of accomplishing her ends, her great aim must be
to prevent any of the great Powers from making an alliance with Austria.
Owing to the Franco-Russian alliance, Russia is quite powerful enough to
hinder any effective alliance with Germany.
With regard to an alliance with England, there is one strong barrier
which, if kept up, will always prevent such a coalition, viz., the
Trans-Caspian Railway.
The following ideas would still further separate the two Powers:—
(1) The extension of the railway from Samarcand to Kokan, because from
Kokan Russia can threaten to push on her border to Eastern Turkestan,
and move southward to Tibet, and from there will be able to threaten the
territory of Cashmere, which are the boundaries at present unsettled.
(2) An extension of railway from Samarcand to Tashkend, which is
contemplated, and when completed will connect Siberia from a military
point of view. It can be also taken north-west, along the north-eastern
shore of the Aral Sea, and may be connected with the parent line at
Orenburg, and connected with Russia and Central Asia for military
purposes.
(3) To construct a line from Mertvi, or Dead Bay, on the Caspian, to the
western shore of the Sea of Aral. This would prove another quick mode of
transit, particularly from St. Petersburg and Moscow to Kilif, on the
Oxus, and also to Samarcand. At present steamers ply on the Amu Daria
from the Aral Sea southwards as far as Kilif on the northern boundary of
Afghanistan.
These steamers are 20 feet broad, 150 feet long, and are of 500–horse
power, travelling 16 miles an hour, and are capable of conveying 300
soldiers and 20 officers.
(4) To throw off a branch line from Bokhara to Kilif, and from there to
Balkh.
(5) Two branch lines (_a_) from Merv to Herat, _viâ_ Penjdeh; (_b_) from
Merv to Sarakhs, _viâ_ Chacha, and still further to Kuhsan, in the
direction of Herat.
(6) By entering the Persian dominion from the present northern boundary
to occupy Meshed, proceeding thence to Kuhsan to meet the line from
Sarakhs.
In consequence of the approaching departure for Persia of M. de
Buelzoff, the newly-appointed minister at Teheran, most of the Russian
newspapers warmly advocated the immediate construction of a line from
the northern part of Persia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account