Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
The distance from Scandarum to Bussorah is only seven hundred miles, and
would be safe against attacks, being protected by the double rivers, the
Euphrates and Tigris, for most of its course. Its cost would be
estimated at £9,000,000, which might easily be raised in the London
market. Also if the Mudinia Aksu line be extended to Scandarum, _viâ_
Kiniah or the Scutari-Ismid line to Aleppo, through Angora, Kaisariyeh,
and Abbiston, other beneficial effects may be produced. In the latter
case it amounts, and is practically similar, to an extension of the
Eastern Railway to the Persian Gulf, which starts from Paris, and passes
Vienna, Belgrade, Sophia, Adrianople, terminating at Constantinople. So
a direct land route could be obtained from Bussorah to Calais or
Rotterdam if a bridge was constructed over the Bosphorus.
As I have already shown in chapter VIII., the construction of the
Euphrates Railway would avoid a Franco-English conflict of interests in
Egypt to a certain extent, and a dual control would be established; thus
a strong and effective alliance would ensue, caused by mutual interests,
and England would be able thereby to withdraw her troops from Egypt, and
devote them to the defence of Asia Minor. Thus a firm alliance between
England and Turkey would follow, and would prevent a Mahommedhan
rebellion in India against England, the Sultan being looked upon as the
Mahommedhan Pope.
England will also be able to call Indian troops to her assistance in
Asia Minor. It will follow that as a larger number of troops and a
better communication is obtained in Asia Minor, Austria would be quite
willing to ally herself with England, instead of refusing, as she had
done twice before, the English power at sea being only of little use.
England and Austria therefore can not only jointly support Turkey, but
also England can “come to the assistance of Austria in Europe, and
Austria make common cause with England in the event of Turkey being
attacked in Asia Minor.”
Having a French, Austrian, and Turkish alliance, England can send her
home troops both to India and Asia Minor by the Eastern Railway in a
very short space of time, and can strengthen both countries and also
help in the Balkans if required, and a firm and lasting alliance would
be made.
Why cannot Italy join this alliance? It is a matter of necessity and
advantage, both geographically and strategically, to do so, and if an
alliance in Southern Europe could thus be made, the safety of the
Balkans, Asia Minor, Persia, and Afghanistan might be assured, even if
Germany joined Russia, and the lofty hopes of Russia would be dashed to
the ground.
THE END.
-----
Footnote 1:
Lord Palmerston’s letter to Lord Clarendon, Feb. 17, 1857.
Footnote 2:
John Morley’s “The Life of Richard Cobden,” vol. ii. p. 189.
Footnote 3:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account