Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern QuestionInagaki, Manjiro
History
Japan and the Pacific, and a Japanese View of the Eastern Question
Inagaki, Manjiro
Eastern question (Balkan); Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; Japan -- Politics and government
“In the year 1855 or 1856 his father’s influence succeeded in
procuring him a position in the suite of General Muravieff, who as
Governor-general of Eastern Siberia, had undertaken a more accurate
investigation of the Amoor territory, and was preparing for its
colonization. During this work, the French and English war with China
broke out; the allies occupied Pekin, and seemed to threaten the
existence of the Celestial Empire. This moment was taken advantage of
by Russia, who had already been negotiating for some time with China,
respecting the cession of a large territory south of the Amoor.
Ignatieff was sent to China as ambassador extraordinary” (F. E.
Bunnett’s “Russian Society,” p. 170).
Footnote 4:
“The preciousness of Saghalien in the eye of the Russians, however,
does not lie so much in its coal beds, its promise of future harvests,
its use as a penal colony, or its six hundred miles of length, but in
its situation commanding the northern entrance to the sea of Japan,
and guarding, like a huge breakwater, the mouth of the great river
Amoor” (John Geddie, F.R.G.S., “The Russian Empire,” p. 484).
Footnote 5:
“If war is made to enforce a commercial treaty, we run the risk of
engaging in protracted hostilities, and of earning a reputation for
quarrelling with every nation in the East.... The Japanese may well be
jealous of Europeans, who insult their usages and carry away their
gold” (Lord J. Russell to Mr. Alcock, Feb. 28, 1860).
Footnote 6:
“The Present Condition of European Politics,” p. 175.
Footnote 7:
Earl Russell, Nov. 22, 1861, echoed these conditions (four conditions)
and equivalent, and added a somewhat cunning addition: “_The opening
of the ports of Tsushima_ (in place of Osaka, the centre and trading
city of the Empire) _and the neighbouring coast of Corea as far as
Japanese authority extends_, to the trade of the treaty powers.” It
could only be the expectation of some secret advantages that do not at
first sight meet the eye that could have induced any one to propose
the port of Tsushima for that of Osaka (“Diplomacy in Japan,” p. 61).
The Japanese wisely declined the British offer.
Footnote 8:
IN 1887. IMPORTS IN VALUE FROM EXPORTS IN VALUE TO
Great Britain 25,666,477 tael 16,482,809 tael.
Hong Kong 57,761,039 tael 31,393,189 tael.
India 5,537,375 tael 797,579 tael.
Continent of Europe (without Russia) 2,587,548 tael 11,545,406 tael.
The average value of the Haikwan tael during 1887 was 4s. 10¼d. (“The
Statesman’s Year-book,” 1889.)
Footnote 9:
The Czar approved of the plan for completing the Siberian Railway, and
for its connection with the Trans-Caucasian line, Jan., 1890; the
works are to be commenced by the 1st of May at the latest.
Footnote 10:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account