Man-woman relationships -- Fiction; New York (N.Y.) -- Social life and customs -- Fiction; Young men -- Fiction
"Yes—and he might disapprove. Men of his kind who stand for almost
anything in outsiders are finicky about their own relatives. They really
don’t care what imprudence other people commit; they may even admire
it—even do it themselves—but there’s a difference as soon as it involves
one of the family. I’ve an idea he is like that."
"Isn’t it stretching a thin tie of kinship too far to speak of Jim
Edgerton and ourselves in a family sense? Are you and I not rather
inclined to abuse that word cousin, Diana?"
"He first used it to us," she said warmly; "it is his choice. He’s a
very impulsive and generous boy; do you know it?"
"Yes, I do.... Isn’t it a thousand pities?"
"What about?"
"His losing everything—being so wretchedly poor.... And our being poor,
too."
"Yes," said Diana simply.
"And he’ll never, never recoup. He is full of talent, and nothing else.
What a pity! He isn’t the successful sort. It’s a pity, isn’t it, Di?"
"Yes."
"Because he is already quite mad about you, Di—he’s a perfect boy about
you... How can men of his age retain their niceness and charm and
freshness, after what they usually pass through. With all his
undesirable wisdom and his masculine worldly experiences, he’s
practically as innocent as we are."
Diana suddenly sat up cross-legged on the bed and gathered her ankles in
her hands.
[Illustration: "’I wonder just how innocent we really are,’ she said."]
"I wonder just how innocent we really are," she said, "with all those
things which we have been obliged to know about in our higher education?
And—speaking of education—there was our last year in Keno. That year
did some curious things to us. Do you realize our development, our
worldly evolution since the beginning of last year—how familiar we
became with that doubtful worldly wisdom which is supposed to be part of
the make-up of a woman of the world? ... Do you realize that it was a
year of laissez faire, of revelation, of laxity and acquiescence in
relaxation, a year of paradox, of ceremony sans façon, of schooling
oneself to overlook and accept, of an education in morals and their
immoral variations? How aloof have we kept ourselves from what we have
learned to tolerate?—and how much was due to fastidiousness, how much to
expediency, how much to common sense, and how much to spiritual
conviction?"
"Does your conscience really trouble you?" asked Silvette anxiously.
"No; only in regard to Jim Edgerton. I’d rather he knew how we regard
life before he reclaims relationship in public; that’s all."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account