Jaros Hygienic Wear: The therapeutic and prophylactic application.Jaros, I.
Science
Jaros Hygienic Wear: The therapeutic and prophylactic application.
Jaros, I.
Underwear -- Catalogs
_Porosity, warmth, absorbent powers and elasticity. With advice he
set to work and perfected a modification of the knitting machine
which incorporated into the meshes of the cloth loose lamb's wool.
The samples presented speak for themselves as to its success. By the
use of such a fabric, perspiration (unless excessive indeed) remains
in the insensible state until it meets with the cooling influences
externally in the cotton framework, the integument remaining dry, while
the cotton back, as well as the linen shirt over it, may be "wringing
wet." Exposure to cold draughts with such a suit does not chill the
integument because the sudden increased evaporation occurs at a
distance from the skin, and is separated from it by a layer of wool._
_To test the soundness of the theory I submitted myself to a
temperature of 115° F., under as nearly as possible the same
atmospheric conditions, with the three chief winter suitings, and
obtained the results in table below:_
====================+==============+============+============
| | "Nonotuck" |
| _Jaros | Silk |
| Hygienic | Suiting, | Cartwright
| Wear._ | heavy. | & Warner's
--------------------+--------------+------------+-------------
Weight after | 8,020 | 7,867 | 10,840
" before exposure | 7,010 grs. | 7,140 | 9,600
Difference | 1,010 grs. | 727 grs.| 1,240
Degree of absolute | | |
dryness of air | 61,827 | 77.32 | 69.947
Temp, dry bulb therm| 115° F | 113° F | 116°
Temp, wet bulb therm| 9° | 83° | 88°
--------------------+--------------+------------+--------------
|_Warm but not |Cooler than |Sticky,
|sticky; outer |other wear; |clammy;
Sensation |surface damp; |sticky; skin|wet
|skin dry where|damp; |through;
|wear touches; |comfortable.|uncomfortable.
|comfortable._ | |
====================+==============+============+==============
_From these experiments it is to be seen, that of all the perspiration
exuded, the silk retained (by a small amount) the least; the hygienic
wear the next, and the English woolen goods the most. Note, however,
must be taken of two facts concerning the experiment with the silk
clothing._
_1st. The temperature was 2° F. lower than when testing the hygienic
wear, and 8° than the English goods. Hence less perspiration was thrown
out._
_2d. There was a difference of 15.5° of absolute dryness of the
atmosphere, hence evaporation took place more rapidly from the silk
goods in the dryer atmosphere. The barometer remained almost stationary
during the three days of observation._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account