France. Armée; Joffre, Joseph Jacques Césaire, 1852-1931; World War, 1914-1918
The meaning was clear. It meant that, since Napoleon’s amazing
successes, Prussia had adopted a military _régime_ which gave her
superiority over her neighbours. It was based on universal service. If
France realised how great were her own military shortcomings, she had
not the strength of mind necessary to institute a system involving
serious sacrifice. Even Marshal Niel, who presented a project to the
Imperial Legislature, did not prevail against a conspiracy of optimism
based on a total disregard of the facts. The Marshal, indeed, played
the ungrateful part of a Lord Roberts in warning his nation against an
illusory peace. His was the _vox clamantis in deserto_ calling in vain
for a real national service. His prophetic eyes had seen the storm,
which others preferred not to see. However, the law was altered in a
half-hearted effort to obtain reform, but the old facilities for
substitution remained. It was then decided to create a national Garde
Mobile composed of men excused from active service. Unfortunately,
there was no time to organise it before war with Germany broke out.
Though it lacked training and experience and was comparatively
ill-disciplined, it was not wanting in courage, and proved of utility in
the campaign. Lord Kitchener joined it as a young volunteer.
When the _débâcle_ came, the whole of Europe was able to read the lesson
in the lurid light it flung to heaven. German dominance had been built
up on a conscripted army, against which a volunteer and partially
conscripted army struggled in vain. It was overborne by sheer weight of
numbers. England felt herself guarded by the inviolate sea, but the
other Powers of the Continent adopted the principle of national service.
In France itself, the law of 1872 was the logical outcome of the dread
experience of the _année terrible_. The subsequent legislation, which
is dated 1889, 1905, and 1913 aimed at rendering military service more
complete and more in accord with Republican equality. The last law,
just before the war, imposed the same burden upon each citizen. But an
immense amount of discussion was necessary before reaching this simple
result, for alas! political interests in various specious guises had
interfered with the pure working out of national defence. As a
consequence, exemptions were always considerable. The broadest
interpretation was given to "higher education," and examinations,
useless from a national point of view or as a test of learning, existed
for the sole purpose of allowing the son of the bourgeois to curtail his
military service. It was obvious that a knowledge of some
out-of-the-way tongue could not be held to compensate, in a national
sense, for the loss of a man’s service in the army.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account