John Bull's Womankind (Les Filles de John Bull)O'Rell, Max
General
John Bull's Womankind (Les Filles de John Bull)
O'Rell, Max
England -- Social life and customs; Women -- Great Britain
The failure of the Egyptian campaign has greatly diminished the
popularity of the Liberal party, and it is more than probable that, if
it obtain the victory in the next election, its majority in Parliament
will be reduced to about a score. The partisans of Irish autonomy
number forty: it therefore seems pretty clear that Mr. Parnell, the
head of the Irish Home Rule party, will ere long be Viceroy of
England. Friend John will have to choose between two rather bitter
pills: granting Ireland her independence, or conquering the
Sister-Isle _vi et armis_. The prospect is not a brilliant one.
THE END
APPENDIX.
(_A._)--At the Dublin Commission Court, before Mr. Justice Lawson, on
Saturday, the 7th June, 1884, Brian Dennis Molloy, a wretched-looking
man of 45, son of a magistrate for the Co. Mayo, and who, on the death
of his father, will become entitled to £1,000 per annum, was indicted
for bigamy. The prisoner has married five times, the last person with
whom he went through the ceremony being his own first cousin, a lady
of about 40, Miss Robertina Greene, who has an income in her own right
of £400 per annum. There was only one formal charge against the
prisoner. Several of his wives were in court, and towards them he
assumed a most amusing expression, pretending affection for them by
sighing audibly as he recognised them. He said, "My Lord, might I sit
down? I feel very weak; I am not able to stand; I have been in prison
for the last two months." This permission was accorded. Mr. Stephen
Curtis, barrister, appeared for the accused.--Mr. M'Caffrey, assistant
clerk of the Crown, then read the indictment against the prisoner for
having on the 16th August, 1871, at Brownlow-hill, Liverpool, married
Elizabeth Mary Clancy while his lawful wife, Jane Molloy (_née_
Murray), was still alive. The latter was in court--a grey-haired
woman, who seemed to feel very much her position. The prisoner
pleaded not guilty. Mr. Curtis said he would be able to shorten the
case, for substantially their defence was that the prisoner was
insane. He had always been a person of weak intellect, and had often
been in a state of dangerous lunacy, having been four times in lunatic
asylums, both in this country and on the Continent. The prisoner
belonged to a most respectable family, amongst whom there had been
instances of insanity.[15]--Dr. Banks was examined, and deposed that
he had been physician to the Prisoner's family for a number of years.
He declined to answer with regard to other members of the family; but
with regard to the accused he said that at one time he was labouring
under symptoms of insanity, and had been placed in a private lunatic
asylum. He also understood that he had been confined in two lunatic
asylums in Bruges, and that he escaped from one recently.--Mr. Justice
Lawson: What do you think of his mind now? Witness: I think he is an
imbecile. He is of very weak mind.--Mr. Curtis: Do you think he is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account