John Bull's Womankind (Les Filles de John Bull) — John Shaqi
John Bull's Womankind (Les Filles de John Bull)O'Rell, Max
General
John Bull's Womankind (Les Filles de John Bull)
O'Rell, Max
England -- Social life and customs; Women -- Great Britain
That which we call a pair of _indispensables_ goes by the name of a
pair of _unmentionables_ over here. If you remark in a room, that the
trousers Mr. So-and-so wears are always irreproachable, you will send
all the ladies behind their fans. If you were to follow up the
subject, you would soon create a veritable panic in the room. But go
to any athletic meeting--to Lord's Cricket Ground, or Lillie
Bridge--there you will see gentlemen who, for all covering, have on
their skin a thin flannel jersey, and drawers of the same, about the
size of a fig leaf; saturated with perspiration, these elementary
articles of the toilette cleave to the form as if their wearers had
come straight out of a bath. Nevertheless, all around the course,
looking, admiring, and applauding, you will see a crowd of the fair
sex, that will convince you that an Englishwoman's eyes are not so
easily shocked as her ears.
In the room that contains the Elgin marbles, at the British Museum, I
have seen young girls shading Apollos, whose nakedness was
distressing. The glance of the passer-by did not disconcert them; with
a firm hand, they continued their work unmoved. I have more than once
run away blushing from those faithful reproductions.
Some English girls make studies from the nude figure, under the
guidance of a male professor. I must add, however, in order to be
just, that this latter does not make his observations directly to his
pupils: the young ladies retire to another room, while the master
writes on the margin of their drawings the remarks that their work
suggests to him. I am told that Sir Frederick Leighton, the celebrated
English painter, interdicts the undraped model to his pupils of the
Royal Academy, of which he is President.
Everyone must still remember the indignation which was aroused among
righteous upper circles by the revelations of the _Daily News_, when
that paper had the courage to make known the atrocities that were
being committed in Bulgaria. The ancient spinsters of philanthropic
England have never forgiven the great organ of the Liberal party for
having dared to enter into those details that froze the whole
civilized world with horror and affright. "To think that I should have
lived until to-day," wrote one of them to a Conservative paper, "to
read such things in a newspaper! Have we lost all sentiment of shame?
Must we women be exposed to see these hideous, revolting accounts in
print? That such things should be is bad enough; but that they should
be described in detail ought not to be allowed."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account