[296] R. Howden, vol. iv. pp. 96, 97. Cf. R. Diceto, vol. ii. p. 167, _Rot. Chart._ p. 31, and for dates _Itin._ a. 1, which show that Roger’s “mense Octobris” cannot be right. That Constance had come with her son is nowhere stated, but appears from the sequel. [297] _Itin._ a. 1. [298] _Hist. de G. le Mar._ vv. 12473–4. [299] _Itin._ a. 1. [300] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 97. Rigord, c. 129, says S. John’s Day. [301] _Itin._ a. 1. [302] Rigord, c. 131. [303] R. Howden, vol. iv. pp. 106, 107; R. Coggeshall, pp. 100, 101. [304] Gerv. Cant. vol. ii. p. 92. [305] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 107. [306] He landed at Portsmouth on February 24, _Ann. Winton._ a. 1200. [307] R. Coggeshall, p. 101. Cf. R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 107. [308] R. Howden, _l.c._ John was at York March 25 to 28, _Itin._ a. 1. [309] R. Coggeshall, pp. 102, 103. John was at Porchester on April 28, and at Valognes on May 2, _Itin._ a. 1. [310] Rigord, c. 132. Cf. R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 115, whose chronology is less sound. [311] Cf. the treaty of 1200 in R. Howden, vol. iv. pp. 148–51, and _Foedera_, vol. i. pt. i. pp. 79, 80, with that of 1195 in _Foedera_, _ib._ p. 66. [312] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 150. [313] R. Coggeshall, p. 101. [314] Rigord, c. 132. Cf. R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 115. [315] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 125. Dates from _Itin._ a. 2. [316] _Itin._ a. 2. For the reception at Bordeaux see _Hist. de G. le Mar._ vv. 11956–8. [317] R. Diceto, vol. ii. p. 167. [318] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 119. [319] R. Diceto, vol. ii. p. 167. R. Coggeshall, p. 103, has another version, but it seems to be incorrect. On the whole question of this divorce see Prof. Maitland’s remarks in _Eng. Hist. Rev._ Oct. 1895, vol. x. pp. 758, 759. [320] Innoc. III. _Epp._ l. v. No. 50. [321] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 97. [322] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 150. This was in fulfilment of an agreement made between Philip on the one part, and the count of Angoulême and the viscount of Limoges on the other, just after Richard’s death. Round, _Cal. Doc. France_, vol. i. p. 471. [323] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 119; R. Coggeshall, p. 103. [324] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 119; R. Coggeshall, pp. 128, 129; R. Wendover, vol. iii. p. 168. All these writers confuse Isabel’s betrothed with his father. [325] _Rot. Chart._ p. 97. [326] _Ib._ pp. 58, 59. [327] R. Diceto, vol. ii. p. 170. [328] R. Coggeshall, p. 103. [329] _Hist. de G. le Mar._ vv. 11984–6. Cf. R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 119. [330] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 120. For date see _Memorials of S. Edmund’s_, vol. ii. p. 8. [331] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 139; R. Diceto, vol. ii. p. 170; R. Coggeshall, p. 103 (with a wrong date). [332] R. Howden, vol. iv. pp. 140–3. [333] _Ib._ p. 156. [334] _Itin._ a. 2. [335] R. Howden, vol. iv. p. 160. [336] Will. Armor. _Gesta P. A._ c. 110. Cf. R. Howden, vol. iv. pp. 160, 161. [337] _Rot. Chart._ p. 102. [338] _Ib._