John Law of Lauriston: Financier and Statesman, Founder of the Bank of France, Originator of the Mississippi Scheme, Etc. — John Shaqi
John Law of Lauriston: Financier and Statesman, Founder of the Bank of France, Originator of the Mississippi Scheme, Etc.Wiston-Glynn, A. W.
History
John Law of Lauriston: Financier and Statesman, Founder of the Bank of France, Originator of the Mississippi Scheme, Etc.
Wiston-Glynn, A. W.
Law, John, 1671-1729
M. le Duc d’Orléans took the trouble to speak in private to each
member of the council, and gently to make them understand that he
wished the bank to meet with no opposition. He spoke his mind to
me thoroughly; therefore a reply was necessary. I said to him that
I did not hide my ignorance or my disgust for all finance matters;
that nevertheless, what he had just explained to me appeared
good in itself, that without any new tax, without expense, and
without wronging or embarrassing anybody, money should double
itself at once by means of the notes of this bank, and become
transferable with the greatest facility. But along with this
advantage I found two inconveniences, the first, how to govern
the bank with sufficient foresight and wisdom, so as not to issue
more notes than could be paid whenever presented: the second,
that what is excellent in a republic, or in a monarchy where the
finance is entirely popular, as in England, is of pernicious use
in an absolute monarchy such as France, where the necessities of
a war badly undertaken and ill sustained, the avidity of a first
minister, favourite or mistress, the luxury, the wild expenses,
the prodigality of a King, might soon exhaust a bank, and ruin all
the holders of notes, that is to say overthrow the realm. M. le
Duc d’Orléans agreed to this; but at the same time maintained that
a King would have so much interest in never meddling or allowing
minister, mistress, or favourite to meddle with the bank, that
this capital inconvenience was never to be feared. Upon that we
for a long time disputed without convincing each other, so that
when, some few days afterwards, he proposed the bank to the regency
council, I gave my opinion as I have just explained it, but with
more force and at length: and my conclusion was to reject the bank,
as a bait the most fatal, in an absolute country, while in a free
country it would be a very good and very wise establishment.
Few dared to be of this opinion: the bank passed. M. le Duc
d’Orléans cast upon me some little reproaches but gentle, for
having spoken at such length. I based my excuses upon my belief
that by duty, honour, and conscience, I ought to speak according
to my persuasion, after having well thought over the matter, and
explained myself sufficiently to make my opinion well understood,
and the reason I had for forming it. Immediately after, the edict
was registered without difficulty at the Parliament. This assembly
sometimes knew how to please the Regent with good grace in order to
turn the cold shoulder to him afterwards with more efficacy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account