John Patrick, Third Marquess of Bute, K.T. (1847-1900), a Memoir — John Shaqi
John Patrick, Third Marquess of Bute, K.T. (1847-1900), a MemoirHunter Blair, David Oswald, Sir
Religion
John Patrick, Third Marquess of Bute, K.T. (1847-1900), a Memoir
Hunter Blair, David Oswald, Sir
Bute, John Patrick Crichton-Stuart, Marquess of, 1847-1900
[6] The particulars of this whimsical incident in Bute's university
career have been kindly furnished by Mr. Algernon Turnor, C.B., who was
his contemporary at Christ Church. It was he who rode--though not to
victory--the steeplechaser mentioned in the text. Mr. Turner married
in 1880 Lady Henrietta Stewart, one of Bute's early playmates and
companions at Galloway House.
[7] Eugene Vicomte de Vogüé, whom Bute wrongly styles "Comte" in his
diary, was a few months his junior. One of the most brilliant and
charming men of his generation, he was in turn soldier, diplomatist,
politician, and _littérateur_. He became a member of the Academy in
1888 and died in 1910. He published books and articles on a great
variety of subjects, all marked with the profoundly religious feeling
which characterised him.
{39}
CHAPTER III
RELIGIOUS INQUIRIES--RECEPTION POSTPONED--COMING OF AGE
1867, 1868
A well-meaning person thought well to compile and publish, some years
ago, a volume in which a few distinguished Roman Catholics, and a great
number of mediocrities, were invited to describe the process and
motives which led them "to abandon" (as some cynic once expressed it)
"the errors of the Church of England for those of the Church of Rome."
Lord Bute, who was among the many more or less eminent people who
received and declined invitations to contribute to this symposium, was
certainly the last man likely to consent to recount his own religious
experiences for the benefit of a curious public. It is, therefore, all
the more interesting that in a copy of the book above referred to,
belonging to one of his most intimate friends,[1] was preserved a
memorandum in Bute's writing, which throws an interesting light on
some, at least, of the causes which were contributory to his own
submission to the Roman Church.
I came to see very clearly indeed that the Reformation was in England
and Scotland--I had not studied it elsewhere--the work neither of God
nor of the people, its real authors being, in the former country, {40}
a lustful and tyrannical King, and in the latter a pack of greedy,
time-serving and unpatriotic nobles. (Almost the only real patriots in
Scotland at that period were bishops like Elphinstone, Reid, and
Dunbar.)
I also convinced myself (1) that while the disorders rampant in the
Church during the sixteenth century clamoured loudly for reform, they
in no way justified apostacy and schism; and (2) that were I personally
to continue, under that or any other pretext, to remain outside the
Catholic and Roman Church, I should be making myself an accomplice
after the fact in a great national crime and the most indefensible act
in history. And I refused to accept any such responsibility.
[Sidenote: 1860, Attraction to Roman Church]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account