John Sobieski: Lothian prize essay for 1881 — John Shaqi
John Sobieski: Lothian prize essay for 1881Tatham, Edward H. R. (Edward Henry Ralph)
History
John Sobieski: Lothian prize essay for 1881
Tatham, Edward H. R. (Edward Henry Ralph)
John III Sobieski, King of Poland, 1629-1696
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES:
Footnote anchors are denoted by [number], and the footnotes
have been moved to the end of the essay.
Italicized text is surrounded by underscores: _italics_.
Sidenotes, also in italics in the original, are surrounded
by ♦diamonds♦.
Text in small caps has been converted to ALL CAPS.
Variations in spelling, punctuation and hyphenation have
been standardized. Obvious typographical errors have been
corrected. Proper names, French language, and "reproch" in
the diary entry, have been retained as published in the
original publication.
JOHN SOBIESKI.
LOTHIAN PRIZE ESSAY
FOR
1881.
BY
EDWARD H. R. TATHAM, B.A.
BRASENOSE COLLEGE.
“Non perchè re sei tu, si grande sei,
Ma per te cresce e in maggior pregio sale
La maesta regale.”
VINCENZIO DA FILICAIA, _Canzone_.
OXFORD:
A. THOMAS SHRIMPTON & SON, BROAD STREET.
LONDON: SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, & CO.
1881.
JOHN SOBIESKI.
♦Strangeness of Polish history.♦ The Kingdom or Republic of
Poland has always seemed a strange phenomenon in European
history, partly from the aboriginal character of its population,
and partly from its exceptional constitution. The ancient
Sarmatians, who occupied the same territory, had no share in
the old Roman civilisation, but rather, by their constant
irruptions upon the empire, were mainly instrumental in its
downfall. Christianity was introduced in the tenth century; but,
until recent times, no other civilising force has ever effected
a permanent conquest of the country. ♦Aboriginal character of
the Poles,♦ During the eight following centuries the Poles,
surrounded by enemies--on the north and east by more barbarous
tribes, on the south and west by a superior civilisation--were
exclusively confined to the defensive and so missed those
humanising influences to which a conquering nation has so often
had to submit. As late as the eighteenth century they might truly
be called the lineal descendants in race, in character, and
almost in habits, of the hunters and shepherds of the ancient
North. ♦Seen in their social system.♦ Throughout their history
there were two great classes in the State; the so-called noble
class--the heirs of the savage in their desire for equality, and
of the nomad in their love of freedom--and the peasant class--the
descendants of captives taken in war--whose lives and properties
were at the absolute disposal of their masters. Only in the
western portion of the kingdom was there a burgher class, and
this was on the same[1] political footing with the serfs. The
union of two great evils arising from such a system--licence
and servitude--made the Polish constitution as disastrous as it
was unique. Poland thus differed so widely, both socially and
politically, from every other European state, that it would be
impossible to examine any important period of her history without
explaining alike her position in Europe and some of her internal
peculiarities.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account