Chemists -- England -- Biography; Priestley, Joseph, 1733-1804
The theory apart, this paper is as important as these on ammonia and the
marine acid air, and exhibits Priestley at his best. The observations he
makes concerning the main properties of the new gas and its solubility
in water, its inability to burn and to support flame, its heaviness, its
power to unite with ammonia, to be absorbed by charcoal and to liquefy
camphor, are all accurate.
“Having hit upon a method of exhibiting some of the acids in the form
of air, nothing could be easier than to extend this process to the
rest.”
Accordingly he attempted to procure what he called the _vegetable acid
air_ by heating “exceedingly strong concentrated acid of vinegar,” and
states that he succeeded in obtaining an air which extinguished the
flame of a candle and was soluble in water. The paper is very short and
is full of contradictions. In reality, as he subsequently found, he was
dealing with vinegar largely adulterated with oil of vitriol. The
“vegetable acid air” had no real existence.
The next paper in the series is the most important of the whole, and the
one of all others that has contributed most largely to Priestley’s
reputation. It is entitled “Of Dephlogisticated Air, and of the
Constitution of the Atmosphere,” and deals with the discovery of oxygen.
It begins in the following characteristic fashion:—
“The contents of this section will furnish a very striking
illustration of the truth of a remark which I have more than once made
in my philosophical writings, and which can hardly be too often
repeated, as it tends greatly to encourage philosophical
investigations, viz., that more is owing to what we call _chance_—that
is, philosophically speaking, to the observation of _events arising
from unknown causes_ than to any proper _design_ or preconceived
_theory_ in this business. This does not appear in the works of those
who write _synthetically_ upon these subjects, but would, I doubt not,
appear very strikingly in those who are the most celebrated for their
philosophical acumen did they write _analytically_ and ingenuously.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account