Chemists -- England -- Biography; Priestley, Joseph, 1733-1804
“My son Ben’s expenses during ten months’ absence amounted to £112,
and Billy’s to £59, 12s.; this should nearly suffice for the
University, and of itself would to many be a sufficient objection, but
in my opinion the consequence of the expense is abundantly more
pernicious, as it naturally leads to Levity, a love of pleasure,
dissipation and affectation of smartness; diverts the attention, and
prevents the necessary application to serious thoughts and Study. When
I sent my Sons so great a distance, it was with a view to preserve
them from the reigning contagion of a dissipated age, to imbibe good
Morals, acquire knowledge, and to obtain a manly and solid way of
thinking and acting, but they are returned with high Ideas of modern
refinements, of dress and external accomplishments, which if ever
necessary, yet resumed by them much too soon. As one instance, they
think it a Sight to appear without having their hair Frissened, and
this must be done by a dresser, even upon the Sabbath. No person can
more wish for, and encourage an open and Liberal way of thinking and
acting than myself, yet do I think that day should be kept with
Ancient Solemnity, for to say the least, the reverse gives offence to
many serious good People, and exhibits an Ill example at a time when
Religion is at so low an ebb as to stand in need of every tie and prop
(whether real or imaginary) for its support, therefore any relaxation
or Innovation under sanction of such a seminary as yours may have the
most pernicious tendency, for when restraints even in unessentials are
removed they are frequently a clue or gradation to the fashionable
levity of the Age and Irreligion.”
That the _mauvais quart d’heure_ under the ancestral roof was not
without its chastening influence on the improvident Ben is evident from
the fact that the same post brought the perturbed Rector a letter from
him protesting that—
“none of us have been vicious but only gay.... Our recreations have
been innocent though expensive, but they imagine that they cannot be
expensive without being criminal.”
However, he expresses contrition and promises amendment, fears that he
has encroached on Mr Seddon’s goodness and forbearance, and that his
conduct may have acted injuriously on the Academy, etc., etc., and winds
up by saying that Mr Wilkes will probably get a pardon from the Crown,
and that he (Mr Vaughan) does not believe that he ever wrote the _North
Briton_—No. 45.
Alas! Mr Benjamin Vaughan’s contrition was very short-lived, for next
year that “affectionate but distressed pupil” had to confess to the
Rector that he dare not show his accounts to his father.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account