Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society - Vol. 3: ZoologyLinnean Society of London
Science
Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society - Vol. 3: Zoology
Linnean Society of London
Zoology -- Periodicals
II. _Abstract of a Letter from_ C. DARWIN, Esq., _to_ Prof. ASA GRAY,
_Boston, U.S., dated Down, September 5th, 1857._
1. It is wonderful what the principle of selection by man, that is the
picking out of individuals with any desired quality, and breeding from
them, and again picking out, can do. Even breeders have been astounded
at their own results. They can act on differences inappreciable to an
uneducated eye. Selection has been _methodically_ followed in _Europe_
for only the last half century; but it was occasionally, and even in
some degree methodically, followed in the most ancient times. There must
have been also a kind of unconscious selection from a remote period,
namely in the preservation of the individual animals (without any
thought of their offspring) most useful to each race of man in his
particular circumstances. The "roguing," as nurserymen call the
destroying of varieties which depart from their type, is a kind of
selection. I am convinced that intentional and occasional selection has
been the main agent in the production of our domestic races; but however
this may be, its great power of modification has been indisputably shown
in later times. Selection acts only by the accumulation of slight or
greater variations, caused by external conditions, or by the mere fact
that in generation the child is not absolutely similar to its parent.
Man, by this power of accumulating variations, adapts living beings to
his wants--may be said to make the wool of one sheep good for carpets,
of another for cloth, &c.
2. Now suppose there were a being who did not judge by mere external
appearances, but who could study the whole internal organization, who
was never capricious, and should go on selecting for one object during
millions of generations; who will say what he might not effect? In
nature we have some _slight_ variation occasionally in all parts; and I
think it can be shown that changed conditions of existence is the main
cause of the child not exactly resembling its parents; and in nature
geology shows us what changes have taken place, and are taking place. We
have almost unlimited time; no one but a practical geologist can fully
appreciate this. Think of the Glacial period, during the whole of which
the same species at least of shells have existed; there must have been
during this period millions on millions of generations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account