Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society - Vol. 4: ZoologyLinnean Society of London
Science
Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society - Vol. 4: Zoology
Linnean Society of London
Zoology -- Periodicals
All the skulls named _Crocodilus palustris_ which I have seen are
referable either to _C. biporcatus_ or to _C. bombifrons_. With respect
to the _C. palustris_ of Lesson and Duméril and Bibron, the latter
authors consider it to be only a variety of _C. vulgaris_. Their
description would, however, apply very well to _C. bombifrons_, as I
have defined it above; and they expressly state ('Erp. Générale,' t.
iii. p. 113) that all their specimens (twelve in number and varying in
length from 30 centimetres to more than 3 metres) came from the East
Indies or the Seychelle Islands. Now, Duméril and Bibron enumerate only
three Asiatic Crocodiles--_C. biporcatus_, _C. palustris_, and _C.
galeatus_, the last of which was only known to them by description; so
that all the numerous Asiatic crocodiles which passed through their
hands belonged either to _C. biporcatus_ or _C. palustris_. On the other
hand, all the skulls of crocodiles from Asia which I have met with
(amounting to at least twenty) are either those of _C. biporcatus_ or
of the species which I have called _bombifrons_; so that I suspect the
latter title will turn out to be a synonym of _palustris_.
6. _Crocodilus rhombifer._
I have not been able to obtain any skull of this species, which,
according to Cuvier's account and figures ('Oss. Fossiles,' t. ix. p.
102), resembles _C. Americanus_ in the great convexity of its nasal
region, but differs from it in the greater breadth of the skull, and in
the strong converging preorbital ridges, which appear to be limited to
the lachrymal bones. If the figures are to be I trusted, however, there
are other very important distinctive characters about the cranium of
this species; for Cuvier's, fig. 2, pl. 331, which gives a view of the
palate, shows the premaxillo-maxillary suture forming a nearly straight
transverse line.
* * * * *
There remain several species of _Crocodilus_ whose skulls I have not
been able to examine, and of which no sufficient descriptions exist. Of
these, (7.) _C. galeatus_ and (8.) _C. Gravesii_ (_planirostris_) would
appear to be very distinct forms. (9.) _C. marginatus_ is considered by
Duméril and Bibron to be only a variety of _C. vulgaris_; and they take
the same view of (10.) _Crocodilus suchus_. Professor Owen, however, has
figured the cranium of an Egyptian mummy under this name ('Monograph on
the Reptilia of the London Clay,' Pal. Soc., 1850). In the under-view
of this skull (tab. i. fig. 2), the junction of the premaxilla and the
maxilla in the palate seems to be broken away; but on the left side, the
palatine process of the maxilla is entire, as far as the level of the
anterior margin of the sixth tooth, and there is not a trace of a suture
behind this point. Are there, then, two or more species of Crocodile in
Egypt, as Geoffroy St.-Hilaire supposed?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account