Jovinian: A Story of the Early Days of Papal Rome — John Shaqi
Jovinian: A Story of the Early Days of Papal RomeKingston, William Henry Giles
History
Jovinian: A Story of the Early Days of Papal Rome
Kingston, William Henry Giles
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600 -- Fiction
The scheme proposed by Coecus met with general approbation. Jovinian
had retained his seat, his eyes fixed on his manuscript, but attentively
listening to all that was uttered. The words he heard, "If we cannot
overcome, we can corrupt," especially struck his ear; he was too well
acquainted with the errors which had crept in among the assemblies of
the Christians not to be sensible that even those who held the faith
might be led astray: how much more easily might the ignorant idolaters
be led to worship any objects presented to them! As he sat motionless
in his place of concealment, yet more of the scheme was revealed; the
characters of the very persons who were to be made its instruments were
discussed. A feeling of horror and dismay crept over him. Could he by
any means be enabled to counteract it? He resolved to take counsel of
his aged friend, Gentianus. So strictly had he hitherto been watched
that he knew full well the difficulties to be encountered in making his
escape; should his uncle Gaius discover that he had been present he
would guard him still more closely. He dared not move lest he might be
seen; at present he was concealed from the assembled pontiffs by a
pillar, but the slightest movement might betray him. At length the
conclave broke up, and drawing their togas around them, the pontiffs
retired. Jovinian, trembling at the thought of the dark scheme he had
discovered, made his way back to his room. Helpless as he was, he felt
unable to do anything to counteract the plans of the conspirators, yet
it was at all events his duty to make them known to the leading
Christians of Rome; but whom among them could he trust besides Amulius,
and Gentianus and his family? The first, though a presbyter, and a
faithful and earnest man, might not have the courage to denounce a
person of power and influence like the pontiff Coecus, supported as he
was not only by the members of his college, but by all the wealthy
philosophers and idolaters in Rome. Amulius might even doubt the
accuracy of his statements; Gentianus was far more likely to believe
them, could he manage to communicate with him. Should, however, Gaius
suspect that he had been present at the conference, he would be kept a
far closer prisoner than before. Was Eros to be trusted? He could not
have failed to discover that Jovinian had been absent from his room,--he
might have informed Gaius of the fact. Though Eros had professed to be
deeply interested in what he had heard at the assembly of the
Christians, it was doubtful whether he had been really converted; even
if he were so, the dread of the consequences to himself should his
captive regain his liberty, might prevent him from conniving at his
escape. Jovinian, therefore, felt it would be prudent not to trust him;
and, eager as he was to get away, he endeavoured to appear reconciled to
his lot. From principle as well as from disposition, anything like
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account