Jurgen and the law : $b A statement, with exhibits, of the Court's opinion, and the brief for the defendants on motion to direct an acquittal
General
Jurgen and the law : $b A statement, with exhibits, of the Court's opinion, and the brief for the defendants on motion to direct an acquittal
Cabell, James Branch, 1879-1958. Jurgen; Pornography -- Law and legislation
Pages 100, 102, 104-8--These deal with Jurgen’s affair with Guenevere.
If read as a whole, bearing in mind the outstanding point, that
Guenevere’s characteristic was “her innocence, combined with a certain
moral obtuseness” (108) there is nothing lewd or obscene in this any
more than in Hardy’s “Tess of the D’Urbervilles”. Reference may be made
to page 102, where Jurgen had his answer to the question, what sort of
service did women most cordially appreciate. He believed they did not
really desire to be served as (103) a symbol of Heaven’s perfection,
as (336) half goddess, half bric-a-brac. But this opinion was not
suitable for a mixed audience in Glathion, where people believed
otherwise (104-108). They are not said to have done anything but kiss
and talk. The reasons for their talking in privacy are logical. If any
improprieties took place the text nowhere alludes to them. Compare the
first part of Goethe’s “Faust,” Scott’s “The Heart of Midlothian,”
George Eliot’s “Adam Bede” and “Middlemarch,” or Stevenson’s “Weir of
Hermiston,” for precisely similar seductions.
Page 120--Jurgen gets into the bedroom of the Bishop. “His eminence was
not alone, but as both occupants of the _apartment_ were asleep, Jurgen
saw nothing unepiscopal”.--If we are to be literal, then let us observe
that this passage does not say (_a_) that the other was a female; (_b_)
that they were in bed together. Sterne’s “Sentimental Journey” has
passages much more explicit.
Page 144--Jurgen talks concerning Guenevere and Lancelot. Tennyson, in
verse, discoursed of the same thing.
Pages 161-8--Deal with Jurgen’s matrimonial quarrels with Anaitis,
who, for all she is a nature myth and believes in symbolism, is
quarrelsome. She does not like Jurgen to “talk so flippantly about her
religion” (165) and regrets his dislike of his “in-laws”, such as Apis,
the well-known Egyptian god, who “will go about in public wearing
a bull’s head”. What is lewd or obscene here? Surely not the terms
“sacti-sodhana” and “muntrus”. They may look obscene because they are
in an unfamiliar language, but in that language, Sanscrit, counsel are
informed, they refer to religious rites of the Brahmins, who are not
commonly rated as lewd.
Pages 170-1--Shows that nature myths last only as long as the
philologists let them, hence they are Epicureans. But Jurgen, being a
doubter, is not sure that death ends all. Is there anything Lewd or
obscene in this quaint turning of the tables on the materialists?
Pages 174-7--Continues the matrimonial life of Jurgen and Anaitis,
ending with the conviction, forced on him, that the ruling spirit
of this land of hers is nothing else but Cybele, the Roman goddess
of earth, or Æsred, or Sereda, as she is variously called. And so
he became convinced “that all such employment was a peculiarly
unimaginative pursuit of happiness” (177). Surely a good moral lesson,
if anything.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account