Jurgen and the law : $b A statement, with exhibits, of the Court's opinion, and the brief for the defendants on motion to direct an acquittal
General
Jurgen and the law : $b A statement, with exhibits, of the Court's opinion, and the brief for the defendants on motion to direct an acquittal
Cabell, James Branch, 1879-1958. Jurgen; Pornography -- Law and legislation
And Mr. Sumner finds obscenity on page 142. What do we find there? We
find Jurgen kneeling before a crucifix!
And there let us leave the case.
7--In conclusion.
No book, no matter by whom it is written, should be read without an
appreciation of the motive of its writing. It is the embarrassment of a
case such as this, that the very fact of an indictment, the notoriety
attending it, makes it difficult to sit down to the reading with the
frame of mind that is present when we take a book from a library
shelf. However one may attempt to resist it, there is always present a
certain feeling, if somebody has said that the book is indecent. That
suggestion can influence minds, even the most philosophical. In Lord
Haldane’s most recent book, “The Philosophy of Humanism” (p. 75), he
quotes from the memoirs of the great German philosopher, Hegel, as
illustrating how suggestion can lead to conceptions:--
“In my youth I remember hearing a city magistrate complain
that book writers were going too far, and trying to rout out
Christianity altogether. Some one, it appeared, had written a
defense of suicide. It was horrible, too horrible! On further
inquiry it turned out that the book in question was ‘The Sorrows
of Werther’.”
The last resort against this influence of suggestion is now made. The
book is submitted to this court for judicial scrutiny, guided by the
tests of the law.
Dated October 16, 1922.
Respectfully submitted,
+Goodbody, Danforth & Glenn+,
Attorneys for Defendants,
27 Cedar Street,
+New York City.+
+Garrard Glenn+
(42 Broadway),
+William U. Goodbody+,
+William L. Glenn+,
of Counsel.
DECISION OF JUDGE CHARLES C. NOTT
IN PEOPLE VS. HOLT, McBRIDE
& CO., ET AL
+People+
+vs.+
+Holt, McBride & Co. et al.+
The defendants herein, at the close of the People’s case, have moved
for a direction of acquittal and the dismissal of the indictment on the
ground that the book “Jurgen” on the possession of which the indictment
is based, is not an “obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, indecent or
disgusting book” within the meaning and intent of section 1141 of the
Penal Law, for the alleged violation of which the indictment has been
found.
I have read and examined the book carefully. It is by Mr. James Branch
Cabell, an author of repute and distinction. From the literary point
of view its style may fairly be called brilliant. It is based on the
mediæval legends of Jurgen and is a highly imaginative and fantastic
tale, depicting the adventures of one who has been restored to his
first youth but who, being attended by a shadow in the guise of the
shadow of his old self, retains the experience and cynicism of age
which frustrates a perfect fulfillment of his desire for renewed youth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account