Kanamori's life-story : $b Told by himself; how the Higher Criticism wrecked a Japanese Christian—and how he came backKanamori, Paul M.
Religion
Kanamori's life-story : $b Told by himself; how the Higher Criticism wrecked a Japanese Christian—and how he came back
Kanamori, Paul M.
Kanamori, Paul M., 1857-1945
“In fact, the Bible is a mixture of truth and error, good and bad,
wise and unwise. It contains myths, legends, and fables, just as all
the so-called sacred books of the world religions contain such a
mixture. The Bible must in many cases be interpreted allegorically
and figuratively, deducing only moral and spiritual lessons. You must
not swallow everything in the Bible as true, but must make careful
discrimination. You must separate what is true from what is untrue,
and what is good from what is bad. You must search and find out for
yourself what part of the Biblical history is authentic, and what part
of it is not, who are the true persons, and who are the imaginary ones,
using reason and common sense, just as when reading all other books
written by men.” This is what I was taught by Higher Criticism and New
Theology.
According to my orthodox faith I had looked upon the Bible as the
perfect, revealed Word of God, and as a supreme Judge sitting on the
bench giving an infallible judgment upon all matters pertaining to the
spiritual as well as the moral welfare of man. This judgment I had
looked upon as final, with no one to dispute it. I sat before the Bible
as a client or petitioner waiting for a final decision.
Now came Higher Criticism and turned everything upside down and said,
“No, you are not the petitioner, you yourself are the judge. You must
sit upon the bench of the supreme judge and pronounce your judgment
upon the contents of the Bible, as to whether it is true or untrue,
good or bad, applicable or inapplicable. The Bible, as all other
books, must become a petitioner before you, and your reason.”
So you see the Bible was in this way dragged down from the seat of the
supreme judge to the place of the petitioner, and man with his reason
and common sense was exalted to the seat of the judge.
What authority can such a Bible have over a man when he has to choose
from its contents whatever seems good or suitable for his purpose, and
whatever does not seem so he has a right to discard? Do you think such
a Bible can command us to “meditate therein day and night,” and “turn
not from it to the right hand or to the left”? What becomes of those
precious promises of God in the Bible if they are not the word of God
in a true and exact sense? In the Old and New Testaments there are more
than thirty thousand promises, and they have been life and joy and
strength to Christians for nineteen centuries. But if these are not
really the promises given by God himself, but only the opinions and
conjectures of human beings, how can we trust them? Do you think we can
build the absolute religion of the world upon so fickle and unstable a
foundation as this? The Bible of the Higher Critics is not rock, but
sand, and a house built upon it must fall, and great will be the fall
thereof.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account