Knickerbocker's history of New York, vol. 1 (of 2)Irving, Washington
History
Knickerbocker's history of New York, vol. 1 (of 2)
Irving, Washington
New York (State) -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
Now all this exquisite chain of reasoning, which is so strikingly
characteristic of the good father, being addressed to the faith, rather
than the understanding, is flatly opposed by Hans de Laet, who declares
it a real and most ridiculous paradox to suppose that Noah ever
entertained the thought of discovering America; and as Hans is a Dutch
writer, I am inclined to believe he must have been much better
acquainted with the worthy crew of the ark than his competitors, and of
course possessed of more accurate sources of information. It is
astonishing how intimate historians do daily become with the patriarchs
and other great men of antiquity. As intimacy improves with time, and as
the learned are particularly inquisitive and familiar in their
acquaintance with the ancients, I should not be surprised if some future
writers should gravely give us a picture of men and manners as they
existed before the flood, far more copious and accurate than the Bible;
and that in the course of another century the log-book of the good Noah
should be as current among historians as the voyages of Captain Cook, or
the renowned history of Robinson Crusoe.
I shall not occupy my time by discussing the huge mass of additional
suppositions, conjectures, and probabilities respecting the first
discovery of this country, with which unhappy historians overload
themselves, in their endeavors to satisfy the doubts of an incredulous
world. It is painful to see these laborious wights panting, and toiling,
and sweating, under an enormous burden, at the very outset of their
works, which, on being opened, turns out to be nothing but a mighty
bundle of straw. As, however, by unwearied assiduity, they seem to have
established the fact, to the satisfaction of all the world, that this
country _has been discovered_, I shall avail myself of their useful
labors to be extremely brief upon this point.
I shall not, therefore, stop to inquire whether America was first
discovered by a wandering vessel of that celebrated Phœnician fleet,
which, according to Herodotus, circumnavigated Africa; or by that
Carthaginian expedition, which Pliny the naturalist informs us
discovered the Canary Islands; or whether it was settled by a temporary
colony from Tyre, as hinted by Aristotle and Seneca. I shall neither
inquire whether it was first discovered by the Chinese, as Vossius with
great shrewdness advances; nor by the Norwegians in 1002, under Biorn;
nor by Behem, the German navigator, as Mr. Otto has endeavored to prove
to the _savans_ of the learned city of Philadelphia.
Nor shall I investigate the more modern claims of the Welsh, founded on
the voyage of Prince Madoc in the eleventh century, who having never
returned, it has since been wisely concluded that he must have gone to
America, and that for a plain reason,—if he did not go there, where else
could he have gone?—a question which most socratically shuts out all
further dispute.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account