Knickerbocker's history of New York, vol. 2 (of 2) — John Shaqi
Knickerbocker's history of New York, vol. 2 (of 2)Irving, Washington
History
Knickerbocker's history of New York, vol. 2 (of 2)
Irving, Washington
New York (State) -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
But mark, oh, reader! the deplorable evils which did afterwards result.
The smoke of these villanous little pipes, continually ascending in a
cloud about the nose, penetrated into and befogged the cerebellum, dried
up all the kindly moisture of the brain, and rendered the people who
used them as vaporous and testy as the governor himself. Nay, what is
worse, from being goodly, burly, sleek-conditioned men, they became,
like our Dutch yeomanry who smoke short pipes, a lantern-jawed,
smoke-dried, leathern-hided race.
[Illustration:
THE EDICT OF WILLIAM THE TESTY.
]
Nor was this all. From this fatal schism in tobacco-pipes we may date
the rise of parties in the Nieuw Nederlandts. The rich and
self-important burghers who had made their fortunes, and could afford to
be lazy, adhered to the ancient fashion, and formed a kind of
aristocracy known as the _Long Pipes_; while the lower order, adopting
the reform of William Kieft as more convenient in their handicraft
employments, were branded with the plebeian name of _Short Pipes_.
A third party sprang up, headed by the descendants of Robert Chewit, the
companion of the great Hudson. These discarded pipes altogether and took
to chewing tobacco; hence they were called _Quids_,—an appellation since
given to those political mongrels which sometimes spring up between two
great parties, as a mule is produced between a horse and an ass.
And here I would note the great benefit of party distinctions in saving
the people at large the trouble of thinking. Hesiod divides mankind into
three classes—those who think for themselves, those who think as others
think, and those who do not think at all. The second class comprises the
great mass of society; for most people require a set creed and a
file-leader. Hence the origin of party: which means a large body of
people, some few of whom think, and all the rest talk. The former take
the lead and discipline the latter; prescribing what they must say, what
they must approve, what they must hoot at, whom they must support, but,
above all, whom they must hate; for no one can be a right good partisan,
who is not a thorough-going hater.
[Illustration:
A LONG PIPE.
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account