Guy, of course, went down on one knee, and at once plunged into the
most fiery style of declaration, but Phillis had not read the Mrs.
Chapone of that day for nothing. She brought him back to prose and
propriety, and then the two started afresh, and they _did_ talk!
Guy felt a little “streaked” at first, but he soon recovered his
self-possession, and it would have been edifying for the young mind
to have heard how these two pretty things spoke to, and answered each
other in moral maxims stolen from the top pages of their copy-books.
They poured them out by the score, and the proverbial philosophy they
enunciated was really the origin of the book so named by Martin Tupper.
He took it all from Phillis and Guy, whose descendants, of the last
name, were so famous for their school-books. This I expect Mr. Tupper
will (not) mention in his next edition.
After much profitable interchange of this sort of article, the lady
gently hinted that Master Guy was not indifferent to her, but that he
was of inferior birth, yet of qualities that made him equal with her;
adding, that hitherto he had done little but kill other people’s game,
whereas there were nobler deeds to be accomplished. And then she bade
him go in search of perilous adventures, winding up with the toast and
sentiment, “Master Guy, eagles do not care to catch flies.”
Reader, if you have ever seen the prince of pantomimists, Mr. Payne,
tear the hair of his theatrical wig in a fit of amorous despair,
you may have some idea as to the intensity with which Master Guy
illustrated his own desperation. He stamped the ground with such
energy that all the hitherto quiet aspens fell a-shaking, and their
descendants have ever since maintained the same fashion. Phillis fell
a-crying at this demonstration, and softened considerably. After a
lapse of five minutes, she had blushingly directed Master Guy to “speak
to papa.”
Now, of all horrible interviews, this perhaps is the most horrible.
Nelson used to say that there was only one thing on earth which he
dreaded, and that was dining with a mayor and corporation. Doubtless
it is dreadful, but _what_ is it compared with looking a grave man in
the face, who has no sentiment into him, and whose first remark is sure
to be, “Well, sir, be good enough to tell me--what can you settle on my
daughter? What can you do to secure her happiness?”
“Well,” said Guy, in reply to this stereotyped remark, “I can kill the
Dun cow on the heath. _She_ has killed many herself who’ve tried the
trick on her; and last night she devoured crops of clover, and twice as
many fields of barley on your lordship’s estate.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account