Chetwood does not tell us how Baker played, but he shows us how he
studied, namely in the streets, while overlooking the men who worked
under him. “One day, two of his men who were newly come to him, and
were strangers to his habits, observing his countenance, motion,
gesture, and his talking to himself, imagined their master was mad.
Baker, seeing them neglect their work to stare at him, bid them, in
a hasty manner, mind their business. The fellows went to work again,
but still with an eye to their master. The part Baker was rehearsing
was Falstaff; and when he came to the scene where Sir Walter Blunt was
supposed to be lying dead on the stage, gave a look at one of his new
paviors, and with his eye fixed upon him, muttered loud enough to be
heard, ‘Who have we here? Sir Walter Blunt! There’s honor for you.’ The
fellow who was stooping, rose on the instant, and with the help of his
companion, bound poor Baker hand and foot, and assisted by other people
no wiser than themselves, they carried him home in that condition, with
a great mob at their heels.”
Estcourt’s Falstaff was flat and trifling, yet with a certain
waggishness. That of Harper was droll, but low and coarse. The Falstaff
of Evans seems to have been in the amorous scenes, as offensive as
Dowton in Major Sturgeon; and the humor was misplaced. Accordingly,
when we read in old Anthony Aston, that “Betterton wanted the waggery
of Estcourt, the drollery of Harper, and the lasciviousness of Jack
Evans,” we are disposed to imagine that his Falstaff was none the worse
for this trial of wants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account