John Kemble occasionally took some unwarrantable liberties with
Shakespeare. When he produced the “Merry Wives of Windsor” at Covent
Garden, in April, 1804 (in which he played Ford to Cooke’s Falstaff),
he deprived Sir Hugh Evans of his knightly title, out of sheer
ignorance, or culpable carelessness. Blanchard was announced for
“Hugh Evans,” without the _Sir_. Hawkins, quoting Fuller, says that
“anciently in England, there were more Sirs than Knights;” and as I
have noticed in another page, the monosyllabic Sir was common to both
clergymen and knights. To the first, however, only by courtesy, when
they had attained their degree of B. A. In a “New Trick to cheat the
Devil,” Anne says to her sire, “Nay, sir;” to which the father replies--
“Sir me no sirs! I am no knight nor churchman.”
But John Kemble was complimentary to Shakespeare, compared with poor
Frederick Reynolds, who turned the “Merry Wives of Windsor” into an
opera, in 1824; and although Dowton did not sing Falstaff, as Lablache
subsequently did, the two wives, represented by Miss Stephens and Miss
Cubitt, warbled, instead of being merry in prose, and gave popularity
to “I know a bank.” At the best, Fenton is but an indifferent part,
but Braham was made to render it one marked especially by nonsense.
Greenwood had painted a scene representing Windsor under _a glowing
summer sky_, under which _Fenton_ (Braham) entered, and remarked, very
like Shakespeare: “How I love this spot where dear Anne Page has often
met me and confessed her love! Ha! I think the _sky is overcast_--the
wind, too, blows like an approaching storm. Well, let it blow on! I
am prepared to brave its fury.” Whereupon the orchestra commenced the
symphony, and Mr. Braham took a turn up the stage, according to the
then approved plan, before he commenced his famous air of “Blow, blow,
thou _winter_ wind!” And the fun-anent Falstaff and the Fords was kept
waiting for nonsense like this!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account