[Mee-tay-wee]
The principal of these is what they call the Mee-tay-wee, a ceremony I
shall compare to freemasonry. But the initiations are public. Every
one that chuses comes to see them, and many are invited. Here, in the
course of initiation, are ceremonies or deviltries performed that no
man of his own mere dexterity or power _can_ do.
[Conjuring]
The next principal one is conjuring. This is a principle I believe as
natural to man as the air he breathes (though not _so_ necessary).
Everyone wishes to peep into futurity, and there are few but who would
not inquire into causes could they do it, or were it not forbidden
them. These two, of course, are consequences or consequents of their
mythology. There are many in the civilized or Christian world who
absolutely and positively deny this power of theirs as being absolutely
impossible and at best [believe them] but absurd and idle stories.
[Evidence of Spirits through Conjuring Practice]
Many of the things related of these conjurings I acknowledge to be
so. But at the same time I am as positively and as firmly persuaded of
the truth of the assertion _that they have dealings with some
supernatural spirit_, as I am convinced that I live and breathe in
air. [That is] unless, indeed, we chuse to acknowledge and believe a
certain sect of philosophers (of the last century I believe) who _wish_
to tell us that we _only imagine ourselves alive_. And I am by no means
inclined to acknowledge myself as superstitious. I am convinced of
this from reason, argument, comparison--in short, from _analysis_. Let
any one man, unless he be a headstrong brute who is _determined_
beforehand not to be convinced, analyse their _discourses_, and I am
confident he will believe as much as many, or have great doubts at
least. To absolutely deny this, we must first deny that there is a
Devil, and afterwards deny his pernicious power. {42} And if we deny
these points, we must descend to a third, and [one] more fit for an
atheistical wretch and a beast than a Christian, or even rational
creature. I have heard some sensible and well informed gentleman deny
it on the plea of their _ignorance_. But this again is _a_ basis and
very solid one.
These people are still in a complete state of nature. Their ideas of
the true God are far from clear or correct. They acknowledge Him
indeed as the supreme and absolute master of all, but more, or rather
as, a passive _deity_ [more] than as he really is. But their notions of
their other deities came far more near the truth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account