Labour and the Popular WelfareMallock, W. H. (William Hurrell)
General
Labour and the Popular Welfare
Mallock, W. H. (William Hurrell)
Labor; Labor movement; Socialism; Working class
ostensibly directed, namely Capital; and not even Capital could make
that time long. Nature, who is the arch-taskmaster, and who knows no
mercy, would soon smash like matchwood a Trade Union of all the world,
and force the labourers to go back to their work, even if no such body
as an employing class existed.
All the ideas, then, derived from the recent developments of Trade
Unionism, that Labour, through its means, will acquire any greatly
increasing power of commanding an increasing share of the total income
of the community, rests on a total misconception of the power that
Trade Unionism represents, and a total failure to see the conditions
and things that limit it. It is limited firstly by Nature, who makes
a general strike impossible; secondly by Capital, without which any
strike is impossible; and lastly by the fact that the labourers of the
present day already draw part of their wages from the wealth produced
by Ability; that any further increase they must draw from this source
entirely; and that, being thus dependent on the assistance of Ability
now, Trade Unionism, as we have seen, has not the slightest tendency to
make them any the less dependent on it in the future.
When the reader takes into account all that has just been said, he
will be hardly disposed to quarrel with the following conclusions of
Professor Marshall, who derives them from history quite as much as from
theory, and who expresses himself with regard to Trade Unions thus:
“Their importance,” he says, “is certainly great, and grows rapidly;
but it is apt to be exaggerated: for indeed many of them are little
more than eddies such as have always fluttered over the surface of
progress. And though they are now on a larger and more imposing scale
in this age than before, yet much as ever the main body of the movement
depends on the deep, silent, strong stream of the tendencies of Normal
Distribution and Exchange.”
[Sidenote ◆1 Trade Unionism, in raising wages, can do little more
than accelerate or regulate a rise that would take place
owing to other causes.]
[Sidenote ◆2 But none the less it may be of great benefit to the
labourers, and remove many evils which a general rise in
wages has not removed, and could not remove by itself.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account