Labour and the Popular WelfareMallock, W. H. (William Hurrell)
General
Labour and the Popular Welfare
Mallock, W. H. (William Hurrell)
Labor; Labor movement; Socialism; Working class
◆¹ So much, then, being admitted, we shall make our calculations best
by starting with the family as our unit, and coming to the individual
afterwards. The average family consists of four and a half persons; and
the families in the United Kingdom number _eight and a half millions_.
_Twelve hundred millions_—the sum we have to divide—would give each
family an income of _a hundred and forty pounds_. From this, however,
we should have to deduct taxes; and, since if all classes were equal,
all would have to be taxed equally,—the amount due from each family
would be considerable. Public expenditure, if the State directed
everything, would of necessity be larger than it is at present; but
even if we assume that it would remain at its present figure, each
family would have to contribute at least _sixteen pounds_.[6] Therefore
_sixteen pounds_ must be deducted from the _hundred and forty pounds_.
Accordingly we have for four and a half persons a net income of _a
hundred and twenty-six pounds_. Now these persons would be found to
consist on an average of a man and his wife, a youth, a girl, and a
half of a baby,—for when we deal with averages we must execute many
judgments like Solomon’s,—and if we distribute the income among them
in the proportion I just now indicated, the result we shall arrive at
will, in round numbers, be this. ◆² The man will have _fifty pounds_,
the woman _thirty-six pounds_, the youth _twenty-five pounds_, the girl
_twenty-four pounds_, and the half of the infant _five pounds_. And now
let us scrutinise the result a little further, and see how it looks in
various familiar lights. An equal distribution of the whole wealth of
the country would give every adult male about _nineteen shillings and
sixpence_ a week, and every adult female about _fourteen shillings_.
These sums would, however, be free of taxes; so in order to compare
them with the wages paid at present, we must add to them _two shillings
and sixpence_ and _two shillings_ respectively, which will raise them
respectively to _twenty-two shillings_, and to _sixteen shillings_: ◆³
but a bachelor who is earning the former sum now, or an unmarried woman
who is now earning the latter, would neither of them, under any scheme
of equal distribution conceivable, come in for a penny of the plunder
taken from the rich. They already are receiving all that, on principles
of equality, they could claim.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account