Labour and the Popular WelfareMallock, W. H. (William Hurrell)
General
Labour and the Popular Welfare
Mallock, W. H. (William Hurrell)
Labor; Labor movement; Socialism; Working class
Now, as to what these conditions and forces are, there is a familiar
answer ready for us—◆¹ Land, Labour, and Capital; and, with a certain
reservation, we may take this to be true. But as Capital is itself the
result of Land and Labour, we need not, for the moment, treat Capital
separately; but we may say that the heap is produced by Land and Labour
simply. I use this formula, however, only for the purpose of amending
it. It will be better, for reasons with which I shall deal presently,
instead of the term Labour to use the term Human Exertion. And further,
we must remember this—the heap of commodities we have in view is no
mere abstraction, but represents the income of this country at some
definite date; so that when we are talking of the forces and conditions
that have produced it, we mean not only Human Exertion and Land, but
Human Exertion of a certain definite amount applied to Land of a
definite extent and quality.
[Sidenote ◆1 The first point we notice is that the exertion of the
same number of men applied to the same land does not
always produce the same amount of wealth.]
[Sidenote ◆2 This must be due to some varying element in the Human
Exertion in question.]
[Sidenote ◆3 Let us compare production in this country 100 years
ago with production now.]
◆¹ Now, as I pointed out in the last Book, one of the most remarkable
things about our national production of commodities, is that the yearly
exertion of the same number of men, applied to land of the same extent
and quality, has been far from producing always a heap of the same
size. On the contrary, the heap which it produces to-day is twice as
large as that which it produced in the days of our fathers; and nearly
three times as large as that which it produced in the days of our
grandfathers. Here then is the reason why the inquiry that is before
us is twofold. For we have at first to take some one of such heaps
singly—on several accounts it will be convenient to take the smallest,
namely that produced about a hundred years ago—and to analyse the parts
which Land and Human Exertion played respectively in the production of
_it_. Then, having seen how Land and Human Exertion produced in the
days of our grandfathers a heap of this special size, we must proceed
to inquire why three generations later the same land and the exertions
of a similar number of men produce a heap which is nearly three times
as large. For the difference of result cannot be due to nothing. ◆²
It must be due to some difference in one of the two causes—to the
presence in this cause of some varying element: and it is precisely
here—here in this varying element—that the main interest of our inquiry
centres. For if it is owing to a variation in this element that our
productive powers have nearly trebled themselves in the course of
three generations, nearly two-thirds of the income which the nation
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account