Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economicsMacassey, Lynden Livingston
History
Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economics
Macassey, Lynden Livingston
Industrial policy -- Great Britain; Labor economics -- Great Britain; Labour Party (Great Britain)
“That this House views with regret the growing volume of
unemployment, and, recognizing the responsibility of the State
towards members of the community who are bereft of the means
of livelihood, is of opinion that every possible step should
be taken to arrest the decline in trade and industry and to
provide work or, in default, adequate maintenance for those
whose labour is not required in the ordinary market.”
The current views of the Labour members in respect of unemployment were
very fully stated, and the parliamentary debate should be read. Shortly
put, their points were these:
(1) The unemployment problem is a national problem; it can only be
successfully solved by the State; it ought not to be left for local
treatment by local authorities.
(2) Work should be found by the Government for every workless citizen,
willing to work, and, failing that, adequate maintenance.
(3) The volume of agriculture should be increased and smallholdings
encouraged.
(4) Trade relations should be established with Russia, Bulgaria, Turkey,
and other former enemy countries.
(5) The Government should establish new trades and industries in this
country.
(6) Public works should be undertaken, like afforestation, main and other
roads.
Critically read, the debate seems strangely barren of any really
constructive suggestions by the Labour Party.
Later, on December 16, 1920, the Labour Party sent a deputation to the
Minister of Labour to urge him to accept the following propositions in
regard to unemployment:
(1) That unemployment insurance is no remedy;
(2) That it is the Government’s duty to provide for the unemployed useful
work in various Government establishments;
(3) That a grant should be made to the Distress Committees under the
Unemployed Workmen’s Act, 1905, in order that local schemes for the
provision of work might be put in hand;
(4) That the principle of the out-of-work donation granted after the
armistice should be restored for the benefit of every unemployed
person not covered by unemployment insurance, and that provision should
be made whereby persons at present unemployed, but not covered by the
Unemployment Insurance Act, would receive benefits under that Act.
This last point was conceded by the Government subsequently in the House
of Commons.
Resolution of December 1920
On December 29, 1920, the Labour Party Conference, called to consider
the report of the Labour Commission in Ireland, proceeded somewhat
inconsequentially to discuss the problem of unemployment in Great Britain
and subsequently passed the following resolution:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account