Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economicsMacassey, Lynden Livingston
History
Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economics
Macassey, Lynden Livingston
Industrial policy -- Great Britain; Labor economics -- Great Britain; Labour Party (Great Britain)
“That this Conference, realizing that the growing volume of
unemployment and under-employment is due in a large measure to
the interruption in world trading following on the war and the
defective peace treaties, in addition to the folly of British
and allied policy in relation to the Soviet Government of
Russia, condemns the British Government for the unwarrantable
delay in securing peace and opening trade relationships with
the Russian Government.
“The Conference further condemns the Coalition Government for
failing to make provision for the prevention of unemployment
and for the proper treatment of unemployed persons; it calls
attention to the fact that in February 1920, the Labour Party
in Parliament introduced its Bill for the prevention of
unemployment, containing provisions for the maintenance and
training of unemployed persons, which the Government refused to
accept.”
The last paragraph of this resolution is important. It has been customary
in recent years for Socialist advocates to assure the workmen that
unemployment can never exist under any of the types of socialistic
organization of industry, but that it is an evil peculiar to what they
call the “capitalistic regime,” and that unemployment is merely one of
the devices of the employer to break down Trade Union conditions and so
lower wages. How exactly the consumer, who, after all, is the person who
really controls the production of commodities, is to be persuaded to
consume and pay for more commodities under a socialistic organization
of industry than under a capitalistic system is not-perhaps wisely
so-explained, but the suggestion of the final paragraph is that were
the present “pernicious economic system” abolished and the Labour Party
in power, then if its Government were unable to provide work it could
and would provide maintenance and, the ordinary worker is told, at full
Trade Union rates of wages. As to how such scheme is to be financed the
resolution is sagaciously silent.
Labour’s Refusal to Co-operate with the Government, 1921
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account