Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economicsMacassey, Lynden Livingston
History
Labour policy—false and true : $b A study in economic history and industrial economics
Macassey, Lynden Livingston
Industrial policy -- Great Britain; Labor economics -- Great Britain; Labour Party (Great Britain)
The war destroyed the delicate pre-war wage-relationship between the
different classes of skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled labour—in some
cases the new relationship is a complete inversion of the old. This was
partly the result of Government Departments concerned in production—the
Admiralty, War Office, Ministry of Munitions—advancing wages of men under
their control independently and without reference to one another, in
some cases actually enticing men to their employment; partly of strong
sectional Trade Union pressure, and partly of the celebrated 12½ per
cent, bonus to time-workers, and 7½ per cent. bonus to piece-workers.
Since the war, the want of balance has been aggravated by the action of
employers and Trade Unions in industries supplying a national necessity,
e.g. building, whereby wages were so raised that unskilled men were
paid more than skilled men in a trade like engineering. There is no
more active cause of industrial discontent. As an illustration of how
it operates, at the Dockers’ Inquiry, the Transport Workers’ Federation
protested against any comparison between dockers’ wages and those of
other workers—they termed it a “capitalistic device” to deprive dockers
of their rightful advance. The Transport Workers were members of the
Triple Alliance; the railwaymen were also members. A few weeks later the
railwaymen were claiming before their Central Wages Board an increase in
wage because the dockers had obtained a minimum wage of 16s. per day. It
is therefore vital to get back to, and as far as possible preserve, the
pre-war wage relationships.
Wages and the Community
Public opinion is beginning to insist, as it ought to do, on recognition
of the interests of the consuming community, which in the past have been
wholly ignored. If an increase in wages in an industry is, and can be,
secured by an increase in price, as when the output is a necessity, the
workers in that industry benefit at the expense of the workers in other
industries, and of the consumers generally. In other words, the public
pays, as in the case of housing. If an all-round increase in wages in all
industries is financed by a general increase in prices, then all prices
are higher, and the commodity purchasing power of the increased wages is
no greater than that of the wages before increase, and again the public
suffers from the general rise in prices. Already a beginning has been
made in recognizing the interests of the community in placing public
representatives upon the Railway National Wages Board.
Are Higher Wages Practicable?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account