Artists -- Fiction; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction; London (England) -- Fiction
He certainly heard Bowker drawing a parallel between his own unhappy
passion and Geoff's regard for the original owner of that "Scylla
head;" but as the eminent speaker was arguing on hypothetical facts,
and drawing deductions from things of which he knew absolutely
nothing, too much reliance was not to be placed on his arguments. In
Bowker's case there had been a public scandal, a certain betrayal of
trust, which was the worst feature in the whole affair, a trial and
an _exposé_, and a denunciation of the--well, the world used hard
words--the seducer; which--though Bowker was the best fellow in the
world, and had obviously a dreadful time of it--was only according
to English custom. Now, in his own case, Margaret (he had already
accustomed himself to think of her as Margaret) had been victimised by
a scoundrel, and the blame--for he supposed blame would, at least in
the minds of very strait-laced people, attach to her--was mitigated
by the facts. Besides--and here was his great thought--nothing would
be known of her former history. Her life, so far as any one in his
set could possibly know any thing about it, began on the night when
he and Charley Potts found her in the street. She was destitute and
starving, granted; but there was nothing criminal in destitution and
starvation, which indeed would, in the eyes of a great many weak and
good-natured (the terms are synonymous) persons, bind a kind of romance
to the story. And as to all that had gone before, what of that? How was
any thing of that love ever to become known? This Leonard Brookfield,
an army swell, a man who, under any circumstances, was never likely
to come across them, or to be mixed up in Geoff's artist-circle, had
vanished, and with him vanished the whole dark part of the story.
Vanished for ever and aye! Margaret's life would begin to date from the
time when she became his wife, when he brought her home to----Ah, by
the way, what was that Bowker said about her worthiness to associate
with his mother and sister? Why not? He would tell them all about it.
They were good women, who fully appreciated the grand doctrine of
forgiveness; and yet--He hesitated; he knew his mother to be a most
excellent church-going woman, bearing her "cross" womanfully, not to
say rather flaunting it than otherwise; but he doubted whether she
would appreciate an introduction to a Magdalen, however penitent. To
subscribe to a charity for "those poor creatures;" to talk pleasantly
and condescendingly to them, and to leave them a tract on visiting
a "Home" or a "Refuge," is one thing; to take them to your heart as
daughters-in-law is another. And his sister! Well, young girls didn't
understand this kind of thing, and would put a false construction on
it, and were always chattering, and a great deal of harm might be done
by Til's want of reticence; and so, perhaps, the best thing to be done
was to hold his tongue, decline to answer any questions about former
life, and leave matters to take their course.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account