Russian literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism
Heine says somewhere that the man who first came to Germany was
astonished at the abundance of ideas there. “This man,” he says, “was
like the traveller who found a nugget of gold directly he arrived in
El Dorado; but his enthusiasm died down when he discovered that in El
Dorado there was nothing but nuggets of gold.” As it was with ideas
in Germany, according to Heine, so was it with the naturalness of
Tourgeniev. Compared with the work of Tolstoy and that of all other
Russian writers, Tourgeniev’s naturalness is less astonishing, because
he possesses the same qualities that they possess, only in a less
degree.
When all is said, Tourgeniev was a great poet. What time has not taken
away from him, and what time can never take away, is the beauty of
his language and the poetry in his work. Every Russian schoolboy has
read the works of Tourgeniev before he has left school; and every
Russian schoolboy will probably continue to do so, because Tourgeniev’s
prose remains a classic model of simple, beautiful, and harmonious
language, and as such it can hardly be excelled. Tourgeniev never
wrote anything better than the book which brought him fame, the
_Sportsman’s Sketches_. In this book nearly the whole of his talent
finds expression. One does not know which to admire more--the delicacy
of the art in choosing and recording his impressions, or the limpid
and musical utterance with which they are recorded. To the reader who
only knows his work through a translation, three-quarters of the beauty
are lost; yet so great is the truth, and so moving is the poetry of
these sketches, that even in translation they will strike a reader as
unrivalled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account